Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
What I find ridiculous is the "panel" which advises Fletcher on who to select for the team. The "panel" consists of Trescothic (say no more), Flintoff (obviously), Strauss (not that experienced), Collingwood (still a Test rookie) and ****ing Gerraint Jones
No wonder Chris Read can't get into the team.
Originally posted by Gordon Brown
(1995)
"A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"
Should only be the captain from the current team. Absolute crap that he calls on other players to help advise on the squad.
I mean, why not use some of the old hands that can't play anymore, or ex-captains. Seems bizarre that players like Jones, Collingwood and Strauss would be anywhere near an advisory board. I mean, what real test experience have they got?
Should only be the captain from the current team. Absolute crap that he calls on other players to help advise on the squad.
I mean, why not use some of the old hands that can't play anymore, or ex-captains. Seems bizarre that players like Jones, Collingwood and Strauss would be anywhere near an advisory board. I mean, what real test experience have they got?
R
The obvious question is this
Will any of these players drop themselves if required?
"For whom He did foreknow, He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son"
Should only be the captain from the current team. Absolute crap that he calls on other players to help advise on the squad.
I mean, why not use some of the old hands that can't play anymore, or ex-captains. Seems bizarre that players like Jones, Collingwood and Strauss would be anywhere near an advisory board. I mean, what real test experience have they got?
R
I think the selectors should have the final say of which Fletcher is one. They should take the opinion of the captain in writing and then discuss it between themselves.
Anyone can pick a bloody squad, these selectors are getting off lightly. THey ough to be picking the team.
Originally posted by Gordon Brown
(1995)
"A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"
I think the captain should have a say but not a veto. He should be able to say who he wants in his team but it should be left to the selectors to make the decision.
I don't think the other players should have any say in it whatsoever.
Originally posted by Gordon Brown
(1995)
"A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"
Agree to an extent, and I would go one step further, IMO, there will always be a bias if the capt has a say in who is selected, close friends would be hard to drop, take that responsibility away from any playing member is the best way.
Selecters should pick a squad, the manager selects the team from the squad for the particular match, the capt catpains on the field on the day.
You could get a player who the captain doesn't gel with or who is obnoxious to the captain. It's different to football as in cricket your captain makes crucial selection decisions on the field such as bowlers and field placings.
Originally posted by Gordon Brown
(1995)
"A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"
I dont think its the worst thing to have players as part of the committee, but this should be the captain and at worst the vice captain, the rest shouldb t be involved. Especially as in this case, one cant seem to handle playing the game at all and the other is not assured of his place in the team.
Panesar should be playing, as he has the ability to win matches, its not a popularity contest. so it doesnt matter if whoever it is doesnt gel with the others as long as he plays well that is the bottom line
Quit your jibber jabber!!!
Jermaine, you know the song Billie Jean...is it about the tennis player??
Comment