PDA

View Full Version : Iraq Plan was delusional


animal magic
15-02-07, 03:34 PM
The US invasion plan for Iraq envisaged that only 5,000 US troops would remain in Iraq by December 2006, declassified Central Command documents show.
The material also shows that the US military projected a stable, pro-US and democratic Iraq by that time.

The August 2002 material was obtained by the National Security Archive (NSA). Its officials said the plans were based on delusional assumptions.

The US currently has some 132,000 troops in the violence-torn state.

The documents - in the former of PowerPoint slides - were prepared by the now-retired Gen Tommy Franks and other top commanders at the time.

The documents were presented at a briefing in August 2002 - less than a year before the US invasion of Iraq in April 2003.

The commanders predicted that after the fighting was over there would be a two- to three-month "stabilisation" phase, followed by an 18- to 24-month "recovery" stage.

They projected that the US forces would be almost completely "re-deployed" out of Iraq at the end of the "transition" phase - within 45 months of invasion.

"Completely unrealistic assumptions about a post-Saddam Iraq permeate these war plans," NSA executive director Thomas Blanton said in a statement posted on the organisation's website.

"First, they assumed that a provisional government would be in place by 'D-Day', then that the Iraqis would stay in their garrisons and be reliable partners, and finally that the post-hostilities phase would be a matter of mere months'," Mr Blanton said.

"All of these were delusions," he added.

The NSA said it received the documents last month, after making a request in 2004.

The NSA is an independent research institute at George Washington University.

It obtained the papers under the Freedom of Information Act

warrenpeace
15-02-07, 03:39 PM
no kidding :rolleyes:

BillobShaisley
15-02-07, 04:45 PM
That was never the plan, the release of these documents is more smoke and mirrors. The true purpose of the war in Iraq (From the globalists point of view) is two fold. And prioritised in this order.

1. Enable the permanent deployment of a large fighting force somewhere in the Middle East to be ready to help quell any wahabi uprising in Saudi Arabia, make Iran think twice and draw fire from targets in our own countries. That is why we did it under strength, why the generals were replaced with CIA people and why maintating security has appeared to be an after thought.

In this instance its a scarily productive piece of machiavelian political manouvering.

2. Bump up the price of oil, by a) Reducing Iraqi output and b) Creating an atmosphere of fear about the future. And make other moneis through haliburton and other government contracts etc.

Neil Young
15-02-07, 07:02 PM
The Iraq plan certainly was delusional, whatever it was. I really don't think the neo-cons envisaged having 132,000 troops in Iraq at this stage - it's really not in their military or political interests, either domestically or globally.

I do agree that there was a long-term plan to establish bases in Iraq as an alternative to Saudi Arabia and the installation of a puppet government is an important part of that.

As for Blair going along with it all... :shake:

RedWolverine
16-02-07, 01:14 AM
The Iraq plan certainly was delusional, whatever it was. I really don't think the neo-cons envisaged having 132,000 troops in Iraq at this stage - it's really not in their military or political interests, either domestically or globally.

I do agree that there was a long-term plan to establish bases in Iraq as an alternative to Saudi Arabia and the installation of a puppet government is an important part of that.

As for Blair going along with it all... :shake:


:handshake: