Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chavs offer £48M for Robinho....world's going mad!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
    #1

    Chavs offer £48M for Robinho....world's going mad!

    I really do think that rather than talking about salary capping, that someone should finally cap Chelsea's blatant buy at all costs attitude. Manure have spent just short of 1bn since purple nose has been at the helm and the Chavs are not far behind already.
    I know that we have spent decent money ourselves but the prices for average players are inflated because we are one of the big 4. That hypocrite Kenyon is prepared to spend £48M on Robinho and not £20M on Arshavin, it's obvious that the Chavs are run by a bunch of idiots with a fat wallet rather than good footballing knowhow and integrity.
    Last edited by Guest; 15-07-08, 01:09 PM.
    Tags: None
    #2
    Where's that figure being reported mate? Can't see anyone offering anywhere near that amount for Robinho myself.
    "My commitment to Liverpool is 100 per cent. I would die for that Liverpool shirt. I think the club loves me and I feel the same, no matter what the situation." - Pepe Reina, Nov '09.

    Comment

      #3
      Originally posted by BFG View Post
      Where's that figure being reported mate? Can't see anyone offering anywhere near that amount for Robinho myself.
      Just seen it on Ceefax page 338

      Comment

        #4
        Hey if 48m helps get Ronaldo to Madrid I'm all for it. Robinho will not excel in the EPL.
        The Crushing Machine MKII

        Comment

          #5
          Originally posted by El Jefecito View Post
          Hey if 48m helps get Ronaldo to Madrid I'm all for it. Robinho will not excel in the EPL.
          I agree. IMO its just Chelsea donating money to Real to get Ronaldo out of England
          "These stories have as much relation to the truth as an egg to a chestnut." - Racing Santander President Francisco Pernia

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by El Jefecito View Post
            Hey if 48m helps get Ronaldo to Madrid I'm all for it. Robinho will not excel in the EPL.
            Agree with the Ronaldo bit

            Don't with the Robinho bit.. think he'll do well, not £48 million well though lol
            Vive la France

            Comment

              #7
              Just stupid money, yes he is a good player, but 48mil does not reflect his ability.
              25mil at most.

              Comment

                #8
                one nasty tackle from Carra, Scholes or Masher and he will run off back to Spain
                "When a man insults my country I insult him, by taking his woman" Tony Yeboah

                "looking through your posts since 2007 and what you have consistently written about my football team I have come to the conclusion that if you had 1 more brain cell you would be a plant .. your father was a hamster and your mother smells of elder berries, I fart in your general direction ..." Nicey

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Harveybirdman View Post
                  one nasty tackle from Carra, Scholes or Masher and he will run off back to Spain
                  Scholes doesn't make nasty tackles. Every foul he's ever committed is simply the result of well-intentioned over-exuberance, coupled with a heart-warmingly charming inability to time his reckless lunges properly, resulting in the accidental decapitation of numerous overreacting nancy-boy foreigners.
                  Every foul.
                  Ever.
                  Screaming from beneath the waves...

                  Comment

                    #10
                    60m euros. which is about 48m sterling. crazy money, what did they pay for him?

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Originally posted by zimbo View Post
                      Scholes doesn't make nasty tackles. Every foul he's ever committed is simply the result of well-intentioned over-exuberance, coupled with a heart-warmingly charming inability to time his reckless lunges properly, resulting in the accidental decapitation of numerous overreacting nancy-boy foreigners.
                      Every foul.
                      Ever.
                      Errrrr OK

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Originally posted by zimbo View Post
                        Scholes doesn't make nasty tackles. Every foul he's ever committed is simply the result of well-intentioned over-exuberance, coupled with a heart-warmingly charming inability to time his reckless lunges properly, resulting in the accidental decapitation of numerous overreacting nancy-boy foreigners.
                        Every foul.
                        Ever.


                        Now that's satire!
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Originally posted by zimbo View Post
                          Scholes doesn't make nasty tackles. Every foul he's ever committed is simply the result of well-intentioned over-exuberance, coupled with a heart-warmingly charming inability to time his reckless lunges properly, resulting in the accidental decapitation of numerous overreacting nancy-boy foreigners.
                          Every foul.
                          Ever.


                          tell that to Reyes
                          "When a man insults my country I insult him, by taking his woman" Tony Yeboah

                          "looking through your posts since 2007 and what you have consistently written about my football team I have come to the conclusion that if you had 1 more brain cell you would be a plant .. your father was a hamster and your mother smells of elder berries, I fart in your general direction ..." Nicey

                          Comment

                            #14
                            Originally posted by zimbo View Post
                            Scholes doesn't make nasty tackles. Every foul he's ever committed is simply the result of well-intentioned over-exuberance, coupled with a heart-warmingly charming inability to time his reckless lunges properly, resulting in the accidental decapitation of numerous overreacting nancy-boy foreigners.
                            Every foul.
                            Ever.




                            "It wasn't a malicious challenge, merely ill-timed"
                            Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                            Comment

                              #15
                              Originally posted by zimbo View Post
                              Scholes doesn't make nasty tackles. Every foul he's ever committed is simply the result of well-intentioned over-exuberance, coupled with a heart-warmingly charming inability to time his reckless lunges properly, resulting in the accidental decapitation of numerous overreacting nancy-boy foreigners.
                              Every foul.
                              Ever.


                              I hate the way everyone lets scholes off with awful tackles just because he has "never been able to tackle"
                              Just look at the face: it's vacant, with a hint of sadness. Like a drunk who's lost a bet.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X