Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Manchester United back out of deal for Serbia's 'little Kaká'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Manchester United back out of deal for Serbia's 'little Kaká'

    • 18-year-old Adem Ljajic deemed too expensive a gamble
    • United used opt-out clause in £16.5m deal with Zoran Tosic

    * Daniel Taylor
    * The Guardian, Thursday 3 December 2009


    Adem Ljajic will remain with Partizan Belgrade after Manchester United invoked an opt-out clause from signing the 18-year-old. Photograph: Srdjan Ilic/AP

    Manchester United's American owners have terminated an agreement to sign Adem Ljajic, the Serbia Under-21 international, in the January transfer window, after deciding that he is too expensive a gamble, 11 months after publicly announcing that a deal had been put in place to sign the player dubbed the "little Kaká" in his own country.

    Ljajic, 18, was part of the £16.5m deal that also saw his Partizan Belgrade team-mate Zoran Tosic move to Old Trafford last January. The teenager had been on trial at United the previous October and was regarded at the time as the more promising of the two players but United also decided that he should remain in Belgrade to get some more first-team experience before moving to England.

    What was not revealed at the time was that the club also stipulated that a get-out clause was written into the contract to cover themselves before Ljajic moved to Manchester long term, and the club have now confirmed they have used that agreement to pull out of the arrangement.

    The official reason is that Ljajic has failed to live up to the hype since he broke into the Partizan team at the start of the 2008-09 season and has not impressed United's coaching staff on his regular trips to Manchester to train with the rest of Sir Alex Ferguson's players. Tosic has also struggled to make a favourable impact, making only five substitute appearances despite being a regular in the Serbia national side.

    A United spokesperson said: "We had an option to buy the player but, having closely monitored his development over the past 12 months, and taken into consideration the young players emerging through the ranks at the club, we have not chosen to pursue the transfer."

    The decision will, however, raise inevitable questions about whether the club's owners, Malcolm Glazer and his family, have involved themselves in Ferguson's planning for the future at a time when they are making substantial cuts at Old Trafford.

    United have accrued debts in excess of £600m and Ferguson has been informed he will be operating under tight restraints in the January transfer window, regardless of the club receiving £80m in one single payment from Real Madrid for the signing of Cristiano Ronaldo in the summer.

    The Glazers have implemented wide-ranging cuts and, though it has yet to be confirmed, there is a sense that in their current financial position they might have misgivings about paying such a substantial figure for a largely unproven teenager.

    This turnaround, however, is extraordinary given that Manchester United's official website described Ljajic as "Serbia's brightest young talent" when the signing was announced, hailing him as an "attacking midfielder blessed with vision and intelligence". The player, then 17, spoke of his excitement about moving to England, saying: "I first heard they were interested in me about a year and a half ago and spent a week at Carrington training with the first team, which I really enjoyed. I feel very happy to be a Manchester United player. Everyone at the club has made me feel very welcome and I'm looking forward to joining in January."

    Tosic has his own problems but has been encouraged by scoring four goals in the last four reserve fixtures, and the 22-year-old was a second-half substitute in the 2-0 Carling Cup defeat of Tottenham Hotspur on Tuesday. "I'm still trying to get used to English football and adapt to the style of the game here," he said. "It's still new for me but I'm getting used to it." Unfortunately for Ljajic, he will not get that chance.
    "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
    -- William Blake

    #2
    even with £80m in the bank they're ****ed. yet people crucify us for being careful with the spending.
    Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won’t expect it back. Oscar Wilde

    Comment


      #3
      Hahahaha £16.5m on those two ****ing duffers. Ferguson's list of howlers is as long as my arm but, as ever, no-one ever says a ****ing word.
      Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

      Comment


        #4
        Nothing like a good news story on a Thursday afternoon.

        All my Manc supporting mates have been raving about this kid. Will be interesting to see what they have to say about him now.
        A humble guy with healthy desire.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by BobTheCharmer View Post
          even with £80m in the bank they're ****ed. yet people crucify us for being careful with the spending.
          Maybe they just realised he's ****e
          Well, here we are in a room with two manky hookers and a racist dwarf. I think I'm heading home.

          Comment


            #6
            However, president Dragan Djuric claims work permit problems are proving the sticking point for any transfer to be sealed.

            "I read the news in our media about the possibility that Adem Ljajic will not go to Manchester," Djuric told the Serbian media.

            "All this is in the field of speculation. The truth is that Manchester United has not yet arranged a work permit to our players, but so far none of them refused.

            "Maybe the news came because Manchester United is in financial crisis, but believe me we did not get anything official."

            Ljajic's agent, Mladen Furtala, is refusing to panic and remains hopeful the move will eventually go through.

            "As far as I know, the only problem is the work permit," said Furtala.

            "Manchester can solve this quickly. Journalists called me, asking what was happening, but I am confident that everything will be OK at best and that from January Ljajic will be officially a Manchester United player."
            _____________________________________

            Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

            Think we have the answer..Slot!!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
              Hahahaha £16.5m on those two ****ing duffers. Ferguson's list of howlers is as long as my arm but, as ever, no-one ever says a ****ing word.
              Sadly thats because despite his garbage signings they still win the ****ing thing
              "When a man insults my country I insult him, by taking his woman" Tony Yeboah

              "looking through your posts since 2007 and what you have consistently written about my football team I have come to the conclusion that if you had 1 more brain cell you would be a plant .. your father was a hamster and your mother smells of elder berries, I fart in your general direction ..." Nicey

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Harv View Post
                Sadly thats because despite his garbage signings they still win the ****ing thing
                In most cases, when he makes mistakes, he is able to rectify those by throwing in more money. In 2004, they had Van Nistelroy, Saha and some other striker ( maybe forlan) all big money purchases and they still had the money to go after Rooney. We are struggling to raise money to buy a decent squad.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by peekay View Post
                  In most cases, when he makes mistakes, he is able to rectify those by throwing in more money. In 2004, they had Van Nistelroy, Saha and some other striker ( maybe forlan) all big money purchases and they still had the money to go after Rooney. We are struggling to raise money to buy a decent squad.
                  The media seem to not only ignore his flops, but also the amount of 15-20mill plus signings he's made compared to us over the years.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                    Hahahaha £16.5m on those two ****ing duffers. Ferguson's list of howlers is as long as my arm but, as ever, no-one ever says a ****ing word.
                    The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      henrywinter

                      Easy to understand why ManU fans even more concerned by Glazers. Fans deserve to know why interest in Ljajic ended. Can't they afford him?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        it is cos I wikipedia'd him on Tuesday night
                        James Philip Milner Fanclub #1

                        Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Manchester United's retreat from the top end of the transfer market is highlighted by official club figures which reveal that a net sum of only £32.4million has been invested on new players since the Glazer family's takeover in May 2005.

                          United's decision to walk away from a £10 million option to buy Partizan Belgrade teenager Adem Ljajic this week has prompted claims by the Serbian club that a 'financial crisis' at Old Trafford prompted the deal to collapse.
                          Senior United officials have strongly rejected Partizan's assertions by insisting that the decision not to sign the 18 year-old was based solely on his football ability.


                          But with the net spending under the Glazers amounting to an average of just £6.48 million a season, the club's failure to reinvest the £80 million banked from the sale of Cristiano Ronaldo to Real Madrid this summer has prompted fears among supporters that the club's main priority is now to service their £699 million debt rather than strengthen Sir Alex Ferguson's first-team squad.
                          The sale of Ronaldo, the £5 million raised from Fraizer Campbell's transfer to Sunderland and the decision not to take up a £25.5 million option to sign Carlos Tevez or the £10 million deal for Ljajic, has left United with an apparent £100 million transfer fund once the £20 million summer signings of Antonio Valencia and Gabriel Obertan are accounted for.
                          Duncan Drasdo, the chief executive of the Manchester United Supporters' Trust, said: "Whatever the reason for the Ljajic deal falling through, the fact is, with the revenues flowing into the club, Manchester United should be competing with Real Madrid and Barcelona for players of the calibre of Lionel Messi and Kaka. But instead, we have to carry the deadweight of the Glazers' ownership on our backs.
                          "The true picture will not be clear until after the January transfer window, but with the £80 million Ronaldo transfer fee, plus the supposed £25-30 million annual transfer kitty, a spend of £100 million would effectively be break-even.
                          "Supporters will rightly be asking where the money has gone when they've been forced to pay more and more through the huge ticket-price rises in recent years."
                          A spokesman for the Glazer family insisted during the summer that £60 million could be "reinvested in the squad, doing up the toilets or on new carpets", but United spent a mere £20 million on Valencia and Obertan during the closed season after refusing to meet the £35 million valuation of Lyon forward Karim Benzema.
                          According to United's figures, the club spent a net £8.1 million on transfers in the year ending June 2006, followed by £1.2 million in 2007 and £44.9 million in 2008 before making a profit of £38.7 million in 2009 following the sale of Ronaldo.
                          Since June of this year, United have spent a net £16.9 million.
                          Manchester City's £117.5 million summer spending spree highlights United's more cautious spending approach, with Ferguson claiming there is little value in the current market.
                          As a result, United have set their sights on the likes of Napoli midfielder Marek Hamsik and Wolfsburg forward Edin Dzeko as recruitment targets rather than challenge Chelsea for the £40 million-rated Sergio Aguero.
                          THE TELEGRAPH

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Thats a bit of a silly article, the enourmous fee they recieved for Ronaldo has offset the rest of the money the Mancs have spent, they've spent over £100m since the Glazers took over and from what i read did not put any presure on Fergie to sell Ronaldo either.
                            We come not to play.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              It's nice to see it happen to them rather than us for once though.

                              I have to say paying £10m for a player who has done **** all always seemed slightly daft. I think the changes in the financial climate have just made United more realistic. I wouldn't be surprised if a cheaper deal was arranged.
                              "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                              -- William Blake

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X