Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pub landlady Karen Murphy wins TV football court case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Pub landlady Karen Murphy wins TV football court case

    A pub landlady has won her court fight with the English Premier League over using a Greek TV decoder to screen games.

    Karen Murphy has paid nearly £8,000 in fines and costs for using the cheaper decoder in her Portsmouth pub to bypass controls over match screening.

    But she took her case to the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

    It found partly in her favour, and now the High Court in London has also found in her favour.

    The case has been closely watched as it could trigger a major shake-up in the way football TV rights are sold, and potentially pave the way to cheaper viewing of foreign broadcasts for fans of top-flight English games.
    Bypass

    Ms Murphy has spent six years fighting a prosecution for showing live football at the Red White and Blue pub without a Sky subscription.

    Instead of using Sky, on which it costs £700 a month to see Premier League matches, she used the Greek TV station Nova, which has the rights to screen the games in Greece, and which cost her £800 a year.

    She took her fight for the right to use the cheaper provider to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which ruled in October 2011 that having an exclusive system was "contrary to EU law".

    The High Court in London on Friday ruled that Karen Murphy's appeal over using the decoder to bypass controls over match screening must be allowed.

    But a judge made clear that the other complex issues regarding the wider legality of screening matches would have to be decided "at a later date".
    Freedom

    The High Court had originally sent the case to the European courts for advice on numerous points of law.

    The ECJ said last autumn that national laws that prohibit the import, sale or use of foreign decoder cards were contrary to the freedom to provide services.

    The European judges also said the Premier League could not claim copyright over Premier League matches as they could not be considered to be an author's own "intellectual creation" and, therefore, to be "works" for the purposes of EU copyright law.

    But it did offer some comfort for the Premier League, which receives vast sums through its exclusive broadcasting deals with Sky and ESPN.

    The European court said that while live matches were not protected by copyright, any surrounding media, such as any opening video sequence, the Premier League anthem, pre-recorded films showing highlights of recent Premier League matches and various graphics, were "works" protected by copyright.

    To use any of these extra parts associated for a broadcast, a pub would need the permission of the Premier League.


    #2
    she keeps winning

    RIP IRWT post/rant, best ever

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by doogle View Post
      Big result this one for her though.

      High court ruled that using the type of kit she did to get the footy "must be allowed".

      Comment


        #4
        Sky Sports have a monopoly - ridiculous how it's gone on this long.
        Hello mert.

        Comment


          #5
          Glad she won. Fair play to her.

          Comment


            #6
            Can I just say 'bravo' to her. I don't know whether she was just going on a whim or whether she had seeked out some great legal advice but it still takes much gusto to see these things through.

            Looks like they messed with the wrong landlady. Karen Murphy

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Maxiedge View Post
              Can I just say 'bravo' to her. I don't know whether she was just going on a whim or whether she had seeked out some great legal advice but it still takes much gusto to see these things through.

              Looks like they messed with the wrong landlady. Karen Murphy

              This be her.

              Comment


                #8
                I guess this legitimises streams to?

                The European judges also said the Premier League could not claim copyright over Premier League matches as they could not be considered to be an author's own "intellectual creation" and, therefore, to be "works" for the purposes of EU copyright law.
                Oh I don't know.

                Comment

                Working...
                X