Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

West Ham decision

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    West Ham decision

    No points reduction, just a 5.5 million fine

    Got off easy if you ask me, They'll take the fine i guess. Still think and hope they get the drop

    BBC

    West Ham have been fined £5.5m after being found guilty over charges relating to the transfers of Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano.
    But the Hammers have avoided a points deduction which could have ended their hopes of staying in the Premeirship.

    Representatives from the club, including chairman Eggert Magnusson, and from the Premier League attended a hearing in London on Thursday.

    They were accused of acted improperly and withholding vital documentation.

    A West Ham statement read: "West Ham received a fair hearing. The club's submission that the contracts gave no actual influence to any third party was accepted by the commission.

    "The club regrets the fact that they fell foul of the FA Premier League regulations, but the new owners of the club now want to focus on matters on the pitch and remaining in the Premier League. The threat of a points deduction has now been removed and the club's fate remains in its own hands.

    "The Club believes that promotion and relegation issues should be decided on the pitch and we are pleased that the commission agree with that view.

    "The Club will reflect on the financial penalty that has been imposed and will take advice before commenting on the possibility of an appeal or any further steps that might be taken. "

    West Ham are three points from safety heading into a vital game with fellow strugglers Wigan at the JJB Stadium on Saturday.

    Latics' chairman Dave Whelan led calls for West Ham to be investigated, and manager Alan Curbishley: "Wigan have voiced their opinion, and if the boot was on the other foot I'm sure we would have done the same."

    Tevez and Mascherano were part-owned by Media Sports Investment, the company formerly run by Iranian-born businessman Kia Joorabchian.

    The Premier League charges, issued on 3 February, read: "It is the board's complaint that there were agreements in relation to both these transfers that enabled third parties to acquire the ability materially to influence the club's policies and/or the performance of its teams.

    "Furthermore at the time of the transfer agreements for both Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano, and until 24 January 2007, West Ham failed to disclose the third-party agreements to the Premier League and/or deliberately withheld these agreements from the Premier League."

    The transfers were negotiated by former chairman Terence Brown and managing director Paul Aldridge, both of whom have left since the takeover by current chairman Eggert Magnusson.

    Magnusson has already indicated he would never have agreed to the terms of the deal negotiated by Brown and Aldridge and the new regime will consider legal action if the judgement goes against West Ham.
    Last edited by thesilverfoxlfc; 27-04-07, 01:45 PM.
    When you feel like you're done, you are not alone........

    #2
    It'll go to charity.

    Comment


      #3
      I was just interested to see if it had any implications on us, apparently not.
      Com ce, com ca.

      Comment


        #4
        Still not all the details in yet, has just been annouced in the last few minutes
        When you feel like you're done, you are not alone........

        Comment


          #5
          The comission have said that the Premier League can terminate the contract of Carlos Teves if they so wish. I think the reporter said that it was their recommendation that they do this immediately

          That could be even worse than a points deduction if they decide to cancel Tevez's contract
          We managed to rectify it, though, because it now says, "Cook" where it once said "Cock", and "Pass" where it once said "Piss", so it’s slightly less rude.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Gaz View Post
            The comission have said that the Premier League can terminate the contract of Carlos Teves if they so wish. I think the reporter said that it was their recommendation that they do this immediately

            That could be even worse than a points deduction if they decide to cancel Tevez's contract
            hopefully could be good for us!
            _____________________________________

            Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

            Think we have the answer..Slot!!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Gaz View Post
              The comission have said that the Premier League can terminate the contract of Carlos Teves if they so wish. I think the reporter said that it was their recommendation that they do this immediately

              That could be even worse than a points deduction if they decide to cancel Tevez's contract
              Tevez to us it's then
              Just believe and you never know what will happen.

              According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

              Comment


                #8
                Who owns Tevez then???
                When you feel like you're done, you are not alone........

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by thesilverfoxlfc View Post
                  Who owns Tevez then???
                  MSI
                  Just believe and you never know what will happen.

                  According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Just reporting now that if West Ham can't resolve the ownership of Tevez then he won't be allowed to play for West Ham again

                    So looks like they'll have to get a deal similar to the one that we have for Mascherano if they want Tevez to play for them again
                    We managed to rectify it, though, because it now says, "Cook" where it once said "Cock", and "Pass" where it once said "Piss", so it’s slightly less rude.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Can anyone actually explain, in simple terms, what West Ham actually did wrong?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        That's some fine.

                        Man United were fined £14,000 for their part in the crowd trouble in Rome. Clearly they're very different offences and I'm not for one minute suggesting United should've been fined millions, but should there really be such a vast disparity?
                        Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by DJS View Post
                          Can anyone actually explain, in simple terms, what West Ham actually did wrong?
                          They played with two players that they didn't own.
                          Just believe and you never know what will happen.

                          According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by AFII View Post
                            They played with two players that they didn't own.
                            Ok, slightly more simple than i was after

                            What i'm trying to work out is, how did they not own them, and how they could decide to field them when they werent the proper 'owners'....

                            And likewise, in the meantime, how come Tevez has been allowed to continue playing for them?

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by AFII View Post
                              They played with two players that they didn't own.
                              Thats not actually an offence if they are registered to the club though is it. Originally the FA was saying that the hearing was to determine whether or not the contracts gave MSI (a third party) control over selection or other team affairs.

                              Personally I think it is £5.5m penalty to prevent the FA and West Ham being sued by other clubs who have been harshly punished for paperwork infractions. With West Ham taking it instead of a points deduction on the gamble that they stay in the PL being worth the money.

                              It is a disgrace that the fine for this is so high when that for saftey infractions/racism/violence are frequently so low.
                              "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                              -- William Blake

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X