Originally posted by sean_lfc
View Post
-
-
I think Glen will excel under Rodgers, especially if we play with wing-backs, he's perfect for that role.Brandt - Keita - Van Dijk - SessegnonComment
-
-
englands MOTM. kept zlat in his pocket. never gets beaten for pace chasing back.
on one wing, with asley cole out of position, john terry looked like he was running through custard to try and catch zlat. on the other wing Glen beats him, takes the ball off him, and then smacks the back of his legs and says dont even try that again.removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.Comment
-
Unless you're Ollie Holt...Comment
-
He was outstanding tonight. I am pretty sure if he had another 20 games like that for England, Commentators would still mention his defensive weaknesses.Originally posted by baitman View Post
He has been far and away Englands best DEFENDER this tournament_____________________________________
Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?
Think we have the answer..Slot!!
Comment
-
Johnson has been excellent for us as well this season. He's added consistency to his game.Are we winning?Comment
-
Yeah, although he did play Mellberg onside for the first goal..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Their first goal was a crap freekick followed by a miscued scissor kick. Ashley Young then went roaming, leaving Mellberg open and Johnson on the right played him onside.
The second goal was just **** defending.Last edited by Muddled; 16-06-12, 09:30 AM.Comment
-
Originally posted by rudedog View Post
Yes but it wouldn't have been a goal at all if Johnson hadn't been so deep, even if he had been able to get back in time to cover the line and deflect it in like he did.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
So now my previous unquoted post in response to Rudedog's original post makes it look like I'm posting in bewilderment.
EDIT: Rudedog, not Rudo ... soz!Last edited by Muddled; 16-06-12, 09:52 AM.Comment
-
Originally posted by Muddled View PostSo now my previous unquoted post in response to Rudo's original post makes it look like I'm posting in bewilderment.
You're a natural.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
And calling him Rudo allows me to live up to my username. Win, win.
A natural enigma
Comment
-
Unfortunately for Johnson (England's best defender so far) & Cole who has been decent as well, Terry & Lescott will let the team down as they are not good enough imo to be the starting cb's for Ingerlund...Thanks for the memories Rafa - YNWA!Comment
Comment