Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
And it does, but rather incredibly, they didn't look at the offside at all.
Thinking about this a bit more, doesn't a player need to become 'active' before being offside? If they are fouled prior to receiving the ball, did they ever become active and therefore, isn't the inital offside position irrelevant and a penalty can still be awarded? As there was a pull, shouldn't it have been a pen?
Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years1year 0.5 years
Thinking about this a bit more, doesn't a player need to become 'active' before being offside? If they are fouled prior to receiving the ball, did they ever become active and therefore, isn't the inital offside position irrelevant and a penalty can still be awarded? As there was a pull, shouldn't it have been a pen?
I would argue forcing the defender to take action makes you an active participant
Hahaha.....VAR correctly overules pen awarded to Arsenal.
Despite Alan Smith - 'That's a pen. Trip on Saka. VAR won't be overuling that' a minute beforehand.
2 angles was all that's needed to show it wasn't a pen.
"I will make the boys feel your support"
Jurgen Klopp June 2020
I would argue forcing the defender to take action makes you an active participant
The very fact you're trying to get on the end of the ball is enough to judge you active.
The very fact that it appears as though they weren't interested in him being initially off is rather worrying.
Seems to be all that mattered when VVD was assaulted after all.
"I will make the boys feel your support"
Jurgen Klopp June 2020
Comment