Better than Cisse.

[fah-q]

Bellers got 16 goals last season btw

[lfc4ever]

Bellers got 16 goals last season btw

That couldn't have been while playing for a **** club in the PL, no never, he isn't that good according to some in here.

[fah-q]

I like Bellers and am in the minority who think he could still come good.

[cadmium]

I am and so's my wife

Good Python quote mate

[Ron_Mexico]

bellamy is so much better than cisse its not even close, and bellamy is hardly a world beater himself

his movement is better- he can actually make runs into space, his workrate is better, and he's a much better finisher than cisse. cisse has no first touch, no passing ability, no vision, and has the football intelligence of a 5 year old. and the sad thing is bellamy is also faster than cisse, and pace is cisse's best asset. he's a donkey, a giant donkey

[Kopite_Colin]

19 goals says he's not.

[rage]

if we got 10 million for the pair and used it to offset henry's 15 million i'd take it. It would also mean we would never have this discussion on who was better cisse or bellamy as clearly neither are good enough for liverpool.

[Slim]

Back on topic, Saha is ****.

Injury prone, misses as many as he scores, not an improvement on anything we currently have.

[Maestro]

Cisse is better than Bellamy.

Compare Cisse last season to Bellamy this season.

Morientes and Pongolle are on fire in Spain, does that mean they would perform the same at Liverpool ? No.

You cant judge a strike on how he performed/is performing in a another foreign league, the Premiership is too different, I would have thought we all knew that by now.

The bottom line is Cisse scored 19 goals and provided 7 assists last season.

Bellamy has 9 goals and ??? assists this season.

Cisse, because he scores more goals.

Take away goals in the Champs League qualifiers and it stands at...

Cisse 15
Bellamy 8

Jamo, why do you always persist in harping on about Cissé being better than Bellamy? How often do you need to discuss it? It's been to death - especially by yourself.
It's an irrelevance in any case.

[tomasjj]

Jamo, why do you always persist in harping on about Cissé being better than Bellamy? How often do you need to discuss it? It's been to death - especially by yourself.
It's an irrelevance in any case.

The professionals have an expression for it, mate:
Stimulus - Response

[Jazzmaster]

Cisse is better than Bellamy.

You're crazy

[vantage]

Jamo, why do you always persist in harping on about Cissé being better than Bellamy? How often do you need to discuss it? It's been to death - especially by yourself.
It's an irrelevance in any case.

Maybe because it looks like Cisse is coming back to haunt us. 'kin hell. 14 million down the ****ter. I think pound for pound Bellers was better value, but neither should really have worn the jersey. The only reason we got Bellers was because he was in our price range. Very sad.

But things have changed now!

[desertscouser]

Bellamy is better than Cisse but neither are good enough for the mighty Reds.

[Redlife]

Cisse might have scored more goals, but I think we're a better team with Bellamy.

[Fierce]

So, back on topic then??

Why is the question 'Would you take Saha?'

Surely it should be - 'Lets look at Berbatov'

I'd take him in a heartbeart, cracking striker