Originally posted by Red Chilli
View Post
Sorry Dhavlos, if you think DIC were going to buy LFC without profit being the main motivating factor then, my friend, you are naive. They are an investment company, they exist to make money, that's a fact. If they weren't interested in making money then why didn't they just outbid Gilett? They have the resources to do that many times over.
I can hardly believe you don't apply the same suspicious nature to DIC as you do to H&G especially when you consider the leaked document to sell LFC within 7 years.
I think, sadly, it might be a bit of "grass is always greener" for you. Just my own observation
I can hardly believe you don't apply the same suspicious nature to DIC as you do to H&G especially when you consider the leaked document to sell LFC within 7 years.
I think, sadly, it might be a bit of "grass is always greener" for you. Just my own observation
You make fair points.
My point is I trust a fan with the club more than I trust people who have no affinity for the club. I accept DIC's main motive is profit, but at least with a Liverpool fan on board then what is in the best intersts of the club would be a factor for them.
The leaked document regarding the 7 years was worrying, but to me it also showed they had a clear plan to make the club successful within a given timescale, which is not necessarily a bad thing. DIC to me seemed to have a track record of success unmatched by Gillett and Hicks.
Possibly a case of grass is greener, more a case of "what might have been" and genuine concern that may be the biggest decision in the club's history was not necessarily the right one.
Comment