Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why why why?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 6
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
    #76
    Originally posted by Jimbob View Post
    I think we will finish second again, Only just mind you..And not to Man utd but to Chelsea...They do have a very strong squad..Very good depth.
    Chelsea in my Opinion have always had the strongest Squad in the League, but they didn't win the league the past three seasons.

    I actually think Chelsea will win the Champions league, You can see that because they Brought in Ancelloti. His Ac Milan Side were dismal in the league for a while now. It seems pretty Harsh writing us off before the season even starts.

    To win the league it takes more than just a good squad. it requires the right mentality and Experience. last year in the games we drew it wasn't because we weren't good enough, it was because we panicked and didn't handle the pressure. you can see that because we ran out of ideas and we couldn't get our passes right. We were in a Title race for the first time in a long time , and we gave the mancs good run for theyre money.

    i feel that will be even stronger this year as a Unit. People should just start beliving and supporting the team.

    and the Idoits who Boo lucas really should be banned from anfeild. what a bunch of ****ing assholes. we take pride in being the best fans around, but after that does it really make us any better than the mancs or the chavs ?

    Comment

      #77
      Raise your hand if you had to google the meaning of tautological :hand raise smiley in place: Who would believe my forays onto Est would result in an improvement in my vocabulary. If I was outed as one of the closet yanks, my use of google as a thesaurical crutch would be virtually neoplastic. . . . .
      When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him

      Comment

        #78
        Originally posted by TartanTerror View Post
        Raise your hand if you had to google the meaning of tautological :hand raise smiley in place: Who would believe my forays onto Est would result in an improvement in my vocabulary. If I was outed as one of the closet yanks, my use of google as a thesaurical crutch would be virtually neoplastic. . . . .
        It's not an improvement in vocabulary but an improvement in pedantry.

        Comment

          #79
          Originally posted by fredo View Post
          It's not an improvement in vocabulary but an improvement in pedantry.
          Wrong again.
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment

            #80
            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
            Wrong again.
            You know I'm not wrong. When I'm wrong you usually don't bother with me, but the attention I get means that I get it right most of the time. When a quantity is negligible, it usually isn't worth the effort.

            Comment

              #81
              Originally posted by fredo View Post
              You know I'm not wrong. When I'm wrong you usually don't bother with me, but the attention I get means that I get it right most of the time. When a quantity is negligible, it usually isn't worth the effort.
              Wrong!

              Comment

                #82
                Originally posted by fredo View Post
                You know I'm not wrong. When I'm wrong you usually don't bother with me, but the attention I get means that I get it right most of the time. When a quantity is negligible, it usually isn't worth the effort.
                There's a difference between being pedantic and acquiring knowledge.

                I understand acquiring knowledge is something you're unfamiliar with but try not to judge people by your own non-existent standards.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment

                  #83
                  Originally posted by Assassin View Post
                  Wrong!


                  It would avoid confusion among new members if it was emblazoned beneath his username.
                  .
                  Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                  May the Lord bless this post.

                  Comment

                    #84
                    Originally posted by Neil Young View Post


                    It would avoid confusion among new members if it was emblazoned beneath his username.

                    Comment

                      #85
                      In fairness Jeff Stelling, Teddy Sheringham and Phil McNulty(BBC sport guy) to name but three have all backed us for the title
                      "Let me say for the record, I am not a gangster and never have been. Im not the thief who grabs your purse. Im not the guy who jacks your car. Im not down with the people who steal and hurt others. Im just a brother who fight back."
                      Tupac

                      Comment

                        #86
                        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                        There's a difference between being pedantic and acquiring knowledge.

                        I understand acquiring knowledge is something you're unfamiliar with but try not to judge people by your own non-existent standards.
                        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post


                        It would avoid confusion among new members if it was emblazoned beneath his username.
                        You know what, I'm really sick of this. I'll leave you and you playing this game between both of you as from now.

                        Comment

                        Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
                        Working...
                        X