Anybody else mad we sold Warnock?

[Tee]

Warnock did strike me as a more than decent prospect, but can't honestly say we miss him can we? Would he start ahead of Fabio? Probably not.

[red g]

i am mad we didnt buy Anelka

[Exiled_red]

The problem was after all his injuries he'd very little experience of first team football and was 26 when he left

[Marky]

Warnock did strike me as a more than decent prospect, but can't honestly say we miss him can we? Would he start ahead of Fabio? Probably not.

No he wouldn't but
1) Aurelio is injured alot
2) Aurelio plays left midfield too

So with that in mind i would liked to have seen Warnock stay, he's a very good defender and has improved massively.

Not as if he's not at a bad in Aston Villa and Martin O'Neill is a pretty good judge of a player.

It's a pity but the fella wanted more playing time so it was for the best he moved on.

[cream]

I think he's a great player, the kind of person who i believe could have gone on to be a great and held down his position for years to come

Have you just come out of a coma?

[The Erectile Banana]

No he wouldn't but
1) Aurelio is injured alot
2) Aurelio plays left midfield too

So with that in mind i would liked to have seen Warnock stay, he's a very good defender and has improved massively.

Not as if he's not at a bad in Aston Villa and Martin O'Neill is a pretty good judge of a player.

It's a pity but the fella wanted more playing time so it was for the best he moved on.

It's a false arguement.

He wouldn't have improved as much if he had stayed here as he would not have benefited from the same run of regular games.

If he was still here now he'd probaably be a level or two below what he is doing for Villa and he would be a squad member that many would probably say wasn't good enough for us.

[Marky]

It's a false arguement.

He wouldn't have improved as much if he had stayed here as he would not have benefited from the same run of regular games.

If he was still here now he'd probaably be a level or two below what he is doing for Villa and he would be a squad member that many would probably say wasn't good enough for us.

True but it's still a shame seeing a player flourish elsewhere and you wonder if we had kept him could have forced his way into the starting 11 and become the player he is now. If being the key word, it's used alot in football.

[Lee]

I think he's a very decent player. Not good enough to be first choice for us, but I'd him as backup... and yet we sold him for peanuts.

Was an interview on the SSN website the other day with him saying he wishes he'd have left sooner.

[Red11]

i am mad we didnt buy Anelka

Abso-fcuking-lutely!!

[Icon]

We sold Warnock????

[Joe King]

Far too erratic. Good squad player but nothing more.

[Vermilion]

Good player, Solid, But not good enough, and won't imo progress into a great player.

[Charly]

Good little player.

People overlook the fact he is not a defender, but was bought up as a left sided midfielder, hence the defensive lapses while playing for us.

Would have been a good dwuad palyer with his never say die attitude, and he could play a bit.

[the rev leeroy brown]

gutted he left us. at the time he was just breaking into the england setup and showed real promise. and to look at him now he would easily be our first choice left back and another home grown player too. less injury prone than aurelio and twice the player insua is.

[dww]

Good little player.

People overlook the fact he is not a defender, but was bought up as a left sided midfielder, hence the defensive lapses while playing for us.

Would have been a good dwuad palyer with his never say die attitude, and he could play a bit.

The same could have been said about Ashley Cole in terms of how he was 'bought up'. One of them however improved their defensive play a lot more than the other - neither would now be a top class wide midfield player if they had stuck to their original position.