Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you want Rafa back?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Craig_H View PostWhy do you think he isnt?Originally posted by Neil Young View PostAre we now playing the game where you have to answer with a question?Originally posted by Craig_H View PostWould that be such a bad thing?Originally posted by Neil Young View PostDid you not think I'm saying it isn't?Originally posted by Craig_H View PostAm i supposed to understand what this means??Originally posted by Neil Young View PostDid you find it confusing?Originally posted by Craig_H View PostWho wouldnt??Originally posted by Neil Young View PostAre you getting tired of this yet too?Shut up, Nigey.Originally posted by NigelLG View PostWould you oppose it if I were to voice my deep concerns at the way this conversation is going?.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by danperkins View PostI know Roy is a calamity but i just don't see it an option, he has been here and done his time. Sure he loves the club and still commands alot of respect here but IMO for NESV and the sounds they have been making about what way they want to run things Rafa doesn't really seem a viable candidate.
Especially considering he has already been here, left in bad circumstances, had apparent rifts with certain players, had terrible last season with us, has had terrible season as far as Inter's standards go (might get sacked) and has a reputation of a bit of a trouble maker so to speak at has had controversy at every club he has been with in his career.
IMO i don't see him as a realistic target at all.
I love this bit of phrasing.... 
"In my opinion, I dont see him as a realistic target"
For the record though, the fact that you dont consider him a realistic target is nothing but emphatic vindication of the viewpoint that he is.
Originally posted by Neil Young View PostShut up, Nigey.
Comment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Yeah good one, thats compelling craig.Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
I love this bit of phrasing.... 
"In my opinion, I dont see him as a realistic target"
For the record though, the fact that you dont consider him a realistic target is nothing but emphatic vindication of the viewpoint that he is.

Comment
-
Do you know what the word "coy" means?Originally posted by vlahka View PostI dont want to go through another season of his strange substitions and his constant coyness with owners. 3 clubs in a row he's done this. I dont want to see us trailing in the game and he subs our striker for a defender. Just no.3rd place. Worst champions ever.
Comment
-
I think he meant 'carping' so he wasn't too far off.Originally posted by PC Plod View PostDo you know what the word "coy" means?
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Beaten to it by dane.
tops self.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
So has Arn. He got on it at odds of 400-1..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment


Comment