Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
It was so close it would be impossible for the referee/linesman to tell one way or another, unless the referee sees it cross the line he can't give it, given that people still can't tell one way or another means the referee was right not to give it. Sadly
Problem is, by not giving the goal, the ref IS giving it one way or the other.
It wasn't in, The ref did not give it end of. Ref could not possibly give it in real time without video and that shows its inconclusive. If we were 2-1 up and it was given 'most' LFC fans would be ****ing livid.
It wasn't in, The ref did not give it end of. Ref could not possibly give it in real time without video and that shows its inconclusive. If we were 2-1 up and it was given 'most' LFC fans would be ****ing livid.
I think if we were 2-1 up and it was given, ALL LFC fans would've been delighted to have gone 3-1 up
Problem is, by not giving the goal, the ref IS giving it one way or the other.
Need technology in football.
True but the referee can only give what he sees, if he didn't see the ball cross the line then he can't give the goal, so from rules not giving the goal was the right thing to do (whether the ball is subsequently proved to have crossed the line or not). Obviously I would have prefered him to have made the 'wrong' decision and given the goal.
Technology has to come in, it's a joke that we don't have it at the moment, but that's the way it is.
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
True but the referee can only give what he sees, if he didn't see the ball cross the line then he can't give the goal, so from rules not giving the goal was the right thing to do (whether the ball is subsequently proved to have crossed the line or not). Obviously I would have prefered him to have made the 'wrong' decision and given the goal.
Technology has to come in, it's a joke that we don't have it at the moment, but that's the way it is.
Yep and i bet he didnt see it NOT cross the line either.
Oh we need tech not two useless ****s standing near the goal.
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Yep and i bet he didnt see it NOT cross the line either.
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment