Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Current Squad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Kev, I don't agree it's a good squad.

    Reiner - great, let's hope he stays and Rodgers gets him back to his best
    A.N Other

    Johnson - excellent
    Kelly - young, inexperienced, should get better
    Carra - on the wane but not as bad as some make out
    Skittles - good, if he stays
    Agger - good, if he stays fit
    Coates - young, could be good but got a lot to learn
    Enrique - hmm, patchy and unconvincing but might improve
    Robinson - far too young to judge how good he might be but not ready yet
    Flannigan - far too young to judge how good he might be but not ready yet

    Henderson - young, could be good but needs to mature
    Gerrard - of course he's great, but injury doubts and the passage of time etc.
    Shelvey - young, looks good but lack of pace could limit his potential
    Aquilani - probably off
    Cole - let's hope he goes too
    Allen
    Lucas - boss, obv.
    Speering - top 8 ok, top 4, I don't see it
    Morgan - far too young to judge how good he might be but not ready yet
    Adam - far too crap

    Downing - very underwhelming, might be ok but I doubt it
    Carrol - very, very underwhelming, probably off
    Luis - great, let's hope he stays
    Borinni - who knows but at least he's keen
    Bellamy - good but injuries and age, etc.
    Susso - young, could be good but got a lot to learn
    Stirling - far too young to judge how good he might be but not ready yet
    Pacheco - youngish, might thrive under Rodgers but has to develop soon

    It looks to me like Rodgers has a lot of work to do, both on squad building and developing the players. Ok, it's long-term process so he should get some time but it's a big job. Like Gibbo says, very few would be of interest to the CL teams - I'd add Johnson and obviously Gerrard too, if he were younger and not Mr Liverpool.

    What makes you think it's a good squad?
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      #17
      By the way, that is my regular, serious post about football done for another year.
      .
      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



      May the Lord bless this post.

      Comment


        #18
        that was a serious post?

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
          By the way, that is my regular, serious post about football done for another year.
          It had a ring of a PTP post to it , I especially enjoyed the spelling of certain player names!

          At a push I might even be up for reading two of them a year

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by CJ View Post
            that was a serious post?
            Like Lecter's love interest, it's all relative.

            Originally posted by Pablo1981 View Post
            It had a ring of a PTP post to it , I especially enjoyed the spelling of certain player names!

            At a push I might even be up for reading two of them a year


            Don't worry, it's unlikely to happen but thanks anyway.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              Kev, I don't agree it's a good squad.

              Reiner - great, let's hope he stays and Rodgers gets him back to his best
              A.N Other

              Johnson - excellent
              Kelly - young, inexperienced, should get better
              Carra - on the wane but not as bad as some make out
              Skittles - good, if he stays
              Agger - good, if he stays fit
              Coates - young, could be good but got a lot to learn
              Enrique - hmm, patchy and unconvincing but might improve
              Robinson - far too young to judge how good he might be but not ready yet
              Flannigan - far too young to judge how good he might be but not ready yet

              Henderson - young, could be good but needs to mature
              Gerrard - of course he's great, but injury doubts and the passage of time etc.
              Shelvey - young, looks good but lack of pace could limit his potential
              Aquilani - probably off
              Cole - let's hope he goes too
              Allen
              Lucas - boss, obv.
              Speering - top 8 ok, top 4, I don't see it
              Morgan - far too young to judge how good he might be but not ready yet
              Adam - far too crap

              Downing - very underwhelming, might be ok but I doubt it
              Carrol - very, very underwhelming, probably off
              Luis - great, let's hope he stays
              Borinni - who knows but at least he's keen
              Bellamy - good but injuries and age, etc.
              Susso - young, could be good but got a lot to learn
              Stirling - far too young to judge how good he might be but not ready yet
              Pacheco - youngish, might thrive under Rodgers but has to develop soon

              It looks to me like Rodgers has a lot of work to do, both on squad building and developing the players. Ok, it's long-term process so he should get some time but it's a big job. Like Gibbo says, very few would be of interest to the CL teams - I'd add Johnson and obviously Gerrard too, if he were younger and not Mr Liverpool.

              What makes you think it's a good squad?
              I agree with all of your comments (shock) for a medium sized club with nothing but history to offer it is a good squad. If you asked an honest Manc or Spud or Arse fan to make a similar appraisal of their squads they would come up with something similar. The main differences between the clubs is the others have played to a set pattern and bought players to suit that pattern.

              We bought players using the daft biometricgenetric system, nice to have "x "number of assists and "Y" number of side way passes but it doesn't bond you as a team.

              If BR can install a decent system of play and have options when it doesn't work this team could do very well.

              Reina, Johnson, Agger, Louis and Gerrard would walk into any CL squad, do Arse or Mancs have so many?

              The best signing we made this summer is BR.
              Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
              Those that killed her, were following the law.

              Comment


                #22
                I agree it was vital to appoint a manager with a clear idea of how he wants to play plus the energy and commitment to make it work in the long run (ruling out many high profile 'big names'). Whether Rodgers can deliver remains to be seen but I'm hopeful.

                Man City's squad is full of excellent players. Chelsea look to be rebuilding well enough. Man United need some new players but still have some excellent ones. Arsenal's players were somehow good enough to get them third, although I'd agree pattern of play is probably more important for them than for the others (but technically and physically they seem a lot better than us).

                I agree about those five walking into any CL squad. But how many Man United or Arsenal players would walk into ours? More than five of each - a lot more.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  I agree it was vital to appoint a manager with a clear idea of how he wants to play plus the energy and commitment to make it work in the long run (ruling out many high profile 'big names'). Whether Rodgers can deliver remains to be seen but I'm hopeful.

                  Man City's squad is full of excellent players. Chelsea look to be rebuilding well enough. Man United need some new players but still have some excellent ones. Arsenal's players were somehow good enough to get them third, although I'd agree pattern of play is probably more important for them than for the others (but technically and physically they seem a lot better than us).

                  I agree about those five walking into any CL squad. But how many Man United or Arsenal players would walk into ours? More than five of each - a lot more.
                  Who? I cant think of many but I don't know their squads well enough.
                  Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
                  Those that killed her, were following the law.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                    Reiner - great, let's hope he stays and Rodgers gets him back to his best
                    I agree - I don't think that he's done anything quite as good as Spinal Tap in recent years.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by kev776 View Post
                      Who? I cant think of many but I don't know their squads well enough.
                      Your whole argument kind of falls apart here Kev

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by Pablo1981 View Post
                        Your whole argument kind of falls apart here Kev
                        It was meant to be sarcastic, I don't know any I would replace with our first 11 and I know little of their fringe players. (RVP is the only one but he id off to City or Spain)
                        Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
                        Those that killed her, were following the law.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          It's an okay squad.

                          In my opinion we have a spine that's good enough to compete for the top four - Reina, Johnson, Agger, Skrtel, Lucas, Gerrard and Suarez. However Reina's form hasn't been the same over the last few seasons, Agger and Gerrard have fitness issues, Lucas is just coming back from a long-term injury and Suarez missed a chunk of last season and was also suspended for quite some time at Ajax.

                          We've a couple of good squad players in Bellamy, Kelly and Coates. No better than some of the squad players that we had between 2007-2010 though.

                          Far too early to talk about the likes of Suso, Sterling, Robinson and Morgan. How many times have we bigged up the kids in recent years only for them to slip down the ladders?

                          Enrique was ****e in his first few seasons at Newcastle, then he had two good years there, had a good first half to the season with us and a poor end to the season so I'm not sure how good he really is. We don't even have a left back who is ready to compete with him.

                          Then we have the likes of Cole and Aquilani who will both probably leave but I'd be happy to have Aquilani as a squad player if he wanted to stay. Nobody knows how Borini will do. Carroll's future is also up in the air.

                          Then we have ****e like Spearing, Adam, Downing who are nowhere near good enough for top four teams. Carragher played a lot of games last season and if we're pushing for fourth then he shouldn't be playing.

                          Like I said, we've a decent spine and with a couple of top additions to our first team then we can push for fourth. I don't think our current squad isn't good enough though.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by kev776 View Post
                            Who? I cant think of many but I don't know their squads well enough.
                            Off the top of my head:

                            Man United: Rooney, Cleverly, Vidic, Evra (despite his poor season and obviously ignoring the inevitable personality clashes), Giggs, Scholes, Ferdinand (fitness permitting), Fletcher (ditto), Valencia, Park...

                            Arsenal: Sagna, Vermaelen, Wilshire, Van Persie, Giroud (maybe), Podolski (maybe), Song, Ramsey...

                            I'm not saying each of them would walk into the first 11 but they're a damn sight better than many of our squad.

                            As for Man City...
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              Off the top of my head:

                              Man United: Rooney, Cleverly, Vidic, Evra (despite his poor season and obviously ignoring the inevitable personality clashes), Giggs, Scholes, Ferdinand (fitness permitting), Fletcher (ditto), Valencia, Park...

                              Arsenal: Sagna, Vermaelen, Wilshire, Van Persie, Giroud (maybe), Podolski (maybe), Song, Ramsey...

                              I'm not saying each of them would walk into the first 11 but they're a damn sight better than many of our squad.

                              As for Man City...
                              3 from that list I would take and sack Downing, Speering and Carrol.
                              Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
                              Those that killed her, were following the law.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                You're letting your dislike of the others cloud your judgement. I'm not saying we'd need all of them but any of them would improve the squad, and I'm not suggesting as replacements for the youngsters.

                                You'd keep Cole rather than have Valencia or Park or Giggs? Adam instead of Scholes or Fletcher or Song? Crazy.

                                And I think Vermaelen would be an improvement on any of our centre backs.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X