Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dalglish defends record in second spell at Anfield

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Well we're all in a much better place now so it's probably best to consign this to the history books and concentrate our energy on backing our exciting current new team in charge

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by Tee View Post
      Well, their eleventh hour ill fated change of heart over selling the club did. So I for one hold them responsible for the cowboys taking over.

      Comment


        #48
        The signings of Downing and Adam I can understand as they were doing well with lesser teams and there was a chance that playing with better players they could kick-on to a higher level. Henderson I can understand because he was a young, English, high-energy player who had scored a few goals from midfield.

        The Carroll signing I just cannot fathom. Even when he is playing well you don't have to watch him for too long to realise he's a limited player and some of those limits are on his ability to run without tripping himself up. The stuff that he does better than other players are only useful in a long-ball team. I have to wonder how much of that £35m went to Newcastle because it would almost be reassuring to believe that the people involved were bent rather than think they thought Carroll was Liverpool standard.
        Never knowingly optimistic

        Comment


          #49
          Originally posted by Tee View Post
          Well, their eleventh hour ill fated change of heart over selling the club did. So I for one hold them responsible for the cowboys taking over.
          No, the cowboys almost bankrupted the club. Selling to them was foolish and stupid. And you're right, Moores and Parry are clearly responsible for that. Even so, they're not more at fault for what the cowboys did than the cowboys themselves. That's nonsensical.

          Or look at it this way: if you're going to blame the people who sold the club to the cowboys for what the cowboys did, then you need to blame to blame the people who sold the club to the people who sold the club to the cowboys, and then the people who sold to them, and so on back to 1892.

          I understand why you're angry with the decision Moores and Parry made and there's good reason to be so. All the same, if I had to choose who to shoot and was given only two bullets I wouldn't have to think twice about where to aim the gun.
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
            No, the cowboys almost bankrupted the club. Selling to them was foolish and stupid. And you're right, Moores and Parry are clearly responsible for that. Even so, they're not more at fault for what the cowboys did than the cowboys themselves. That's nonsensical.

            Or look at it this way: if you're going to blame the people who sold the club to the cowboys for what the cowboys did, then you need to blame to blame the people who sold the club to the people who sold the club to the cowboys, and then the people who sold to them, and so on back to 1892.

            I understand why you're angry with the decision Moores and Parry made and there's good reason to be so. All the same, if I had to choose who to shoot and was given only two bullets I wouldn't have to think twice about where to aim the gun.
            What if you had 4 bullets?
            "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

            Comment


              #51


              I'd shoot the cowboys twice.
              .
              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



              May the Lord bless this post.

              Comment


                #52
                Originally posted by Bryncoch View Post
                The signings of Downing and Adam I can understand as they were doing well with lesser teams and there was a chance that playing with better players they could kick-on to a higher level. Henderson I can understand because he was a young, English, high-energy player who had scored a few goals from midfield.

                The Carroll signing I just cannot fathom. Even when he is playing well you don't have to watch him for too long to realise he's a limited player and some of those limits are on his ability to run without tripping himself up. The stuff that he does better than other players are only useful in a long-ball team. I have to wonder how much of that £35m went to Newcastle because it would almost be reassuring to believe that the people involved were bent rather than think they thought Carroll was Liverpool standard.
                Henderson had 4 goals in 4 seasons before we signed him.
                Downing had a low created chance to goal rate (7% about the same as we acheived under Kenny's full season).
                Adam had a pass accuracy of about 67%, which is awful.
                www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                Comment


                  #53
                  Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
                  Henderson had 2 goals before we signed him.
                  Downing had a low created chance to goal rate (7% about the same as we acheived under Kenny's full season).
                  Adam had a pass accuracy of about 67%, which is awful.
                  At that age, I'd doubt Henderson was expected to perform from day 1. Downing had just been voted Villa fan's Player of the Season so must have been doing something beyond creating chances (what I'll never know). Adam, who knows?
                  Substance > Style

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Non - story imo. We've moved on.

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Originally posted by ronanm View Post
                      At that age, I'd doubt Henderson was expected to perform from day 1. Downing had just been voted Villa fan's Player of the Season so must have been doing something beyond creating chances (what I'll never know). Adam, who knows?
                      I'd have thought that but Kenny stuck Henderson straight into the first team, but his scoring record has never been very good.

                      What I was saying was no one those players looked good if you actually looked at them in depth.
                      www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                      www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                      www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
                        I'd have thought that but Kenny stuck Henderson straight into the first team, but his scoring record has never been very good.

                        What I was saying was no one those players looked good if you actually looked at them in depth.
                        Henderson or Downing? Doubt the former was brought in to score goals.

                        In the case of Downing, the season before he joined he scored 7 goals and had 9 assists in the league. Similarly, Chad weighed it with 12 goals and 9 assists in the league alone (not sure how many pens). (Both stats courtesy of fantasypremierleague ). Hardly horrendous.

                        Anyway, as we know, we've all moved on (except me - KCDNW )
                        Substance > Style

                        Comment


                          #57
                          Originally posted by ronanm View Post
                          Henderson or Downing? Doubt the former was brought in to score goals.

                          In the case of Downing, the season before he joined he scored 7 goals and had 9 assists in the league. Similarly, Chad weighed it with 12 goals and 9 assists in the league alone (not sure how many pens). (Both stats courtesy of fantasypremierleague ). Hardly horrendous.

                          Anyway, as we know, we've all moved on (except me - KCDNW )
                          Only commenting on what Bryn said in that regard.

                          A 67% pass accuracy from Adam, which is horrendous. Think I argued all these points at time, none of those players were good when you looked at their stats in depth.
                          www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                          www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                          www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                          Comment


                            #58
                            None of them?

                            I'm glad we signed Henderson. He's a good player.
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              #59
                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              None of them?

                              I'm glad we signed Henderson. He's a good player.
                              I'm glad you're glad. I'm glad too

                              Comment


                                #60
                                Originally posted by Arn View Post


                                If you finish in eight place as a manager for Liverpool FC then you deserve to be sacked but you also need to question if FSG asked Kenny what he think is more important, the league or winning the domestic cups?

                                I think that Kenny had acted differently if he knew that the domestic cups is just a bonus.

                                So it wasn't only his fault IMO that we finished in eight place.
                                Would you sack a manger for finishing 6th ?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X