Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Norwich (H): Build Up

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 11
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 template Next
    #91
    Good team that and let's hope it's true. I'm surprised Sturridge will start due to lac k of match fitness . Thought he would be on the bench.

    Comment

      #92
      Originally posted by DannyMan2006 View Post
      Why didn't he play Ings or Origi with Benteke? Or Firmino?

      Suddenly Dans back and we are changing formation again? Yet play 3421 in midweek? This is all getting ****ing stupid.
      It makes no sense - Rodgers really doesn't seem to help himself.
      The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

      Comment

        #93
        That team (although exciting ) has no width whatsoever. Could we sacrifice Can for Lallana or Firmino?

        Comment

          #94
          Originally posted by kubrickscube View Post
          That team (although exciting ) has no width whatsoever. Could we sacrifice Can for Lallana or Firmino?
          The width will/should/could come from the fullbacks.
          Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won’t expect it back. Oscar Wilde

          Comment

            #95
            Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
            https://twitter.com/damianlfcpl/stat...53978914586624
            That's a death or glory team selection if ever I saw one.

            Lots of fascinating aspects though (Sturridge/Big Chris partnership) but you wonder how the players cope with literally a new formation every game. Attacking as **** though. I predict a 9 goal thriller.
            Modifying post.

            Comment

              #96
              Originally posted by BobTheCharmer View Post
              The width will/should/could come from the fullbacks.
              If the fullbacks are pushing forward to provide width we could easily be left exposed at the back. Also I am not sure they will provide the kind of width we need.
              The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

              Comment

                #97
                Well Moreno would provide a much better option going forward than Gomez, but yeah he can't defend for ****. Clyne doesn't get forward as much as he should with the attributes he has.

                Comment

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Liverpool View Post
                  Isn't he the lad who robbed the team off here and posted it as his own?
                  Yep.

                  Comment

                    #99
                    Originally posted by G View Post
                    Yep.
                    So he knows less than us
                    The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                    Comment

                      #100
                      Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
                      So he knows less than us
                      Yep, like i said, he's read what PST posted earlier and put two and two together.

                      Comment

                        #101
                        Originally posted by danperkins View Post
                        If that is the team, and I hope it is (someone told me heard rumour Sakho & Sturridge would start)... why the **** did he not try this out 4 games ago? If it was his intention to play two up top with Benteke & Sturridge, which seems logical. Why has he persisted with Benteke in an isolated role upfront when we have a perfectly good partner in Ings?

                        If true and he is starting with Sturridge from scratch, it stinks of desperation. Is he listening to the cries of the fans all of a sudden when he has finally realised his setup is all wrong?

                        Baffling.
                        I think the Arsenal game showed what the formation/tactics could do. The Henderson injury and Can's comparatively poor start to the season are influential too.

                        More or less every season since Rodgers has been here he has started with a more defensive setup than the one he seems to want to evolve to use for the majority of the season. Given the class gap between Ings and Sturridge you can see why he wouldn't have favoured deviated from that. Especially as defending was one thing we would all agree we needed to fix.
                        "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                        -- William Blake

                        Comment

                          #102
                          Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
                          If the fullbacks are pushing forward to provide width we could easily be left exposed at the back. Also I am not sure they will provide the kind of width we need.
                          You'd like to think so wouldn't you? I mean it would suggest we are at least attacking if we are leaving ourselves exposed? You just need one to bomb on and then someone to drop in and cover him. It's a judgement call when they make their move. If you attack teams you will leave spaces. Be brilliant if we went gung ho again.
                          Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won’t expect it back. Oscar Wilde

                          Comment

                            #103
                            benteke will start with wings and studge will come on later.
                            removing all the weak links makes us stronger

                            too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

                            Comment

                              #104
                              Its the 3 at the back in the 2nd half v WHU that i still cant get my head around. 3 at the back - with lucas sitting in front of them - against a team that was just sitting back on a 2 goal lead anyway!!!

                              I hope to see the diamond today. Assuming the team is right and lovren is dropped, then that is one right choice anyway....

                              If we get a good win and both sturridge and benteke could both score / look like a good formation could be formed; then we will all have big optimism tonight.

                              Also, if that were to happy, the only downside will be the encyclopedia of an article that tomkins will write detailing how we can only play 2 up front if sturridge is part of that two...

                              Comment

                                #105
                                That team Damien posted is correct from my knowledge. He's a **** for posting it all over Twitter though.

                                I know that's pot calling kettle mind.
                                Last edited by poorscousertommy; 20-09-15, 07:22 AM.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 template Next
                                Working...
                                X