Sion (H) Post Match

[nineteen]

i agree. i didnt think we were THAT bad......but Sion are ****in ****e...

also, i think defensively we are ****in terrible. Really really ****e....

I thought we were very poor. No penetration whatsoever. I can't recall feeling excited at any point during the game.

This teams is very bland. If I was watching LFC for the first time, I'd probably pass on doing it again and go look for a team that plays something resembling attractive, interesting, and attacking football.

[Kenneth]

We weren't terrible, but we weren't great either. We had our chances and didn't put them away. Sion were dreadful. They had gaps all over the place, and we lacked the quality to put them to the sword.

[Rowan]

I've seen worse under Hodgson. Much worse, but that's my opinion.

I think they're starting to look pretty similar.

[frank the tank]

I've seen worse under Hodgson. Much worse, but that's my opinion.

[Venton]

We weren't terrible, but we weren't great either. We had our chances and didn't put them away. Sion were dreadful. They had gaps all over the place, and we lacked the quality to put them to the sword.

On that performance a decent team would have clobbered us. I know it wasn't a first team but you can't really polish that one up.

[Fredo]

I think they're starting to look pretty similar.

Under Hodgson, it was a hoof feast. Then there was Mike fackin' Kelly. It was ****e beyond ****e.

[Venton]

I've seen worse under Hodgson. Much worse, but that's my opinion.

This isn't Hodgson six months in. It's Rodgers' fourth year.

[Buzzo]

I've seen worse under Hodgson. Much worse, but that's my opinion.

Thats hardly mitigating.

[vlahka]

Any interview with Rodgers yet?

[DannyMan2006]

I've seen worse under Hodgson. Much worse, but that's my opinion.

Many performances under Rodgers have been just as bad and Hodgson didn't get £300m to spend. He inherited a team in free fall. He wasn't a good enough manager, far too old school & had to go. But to suggest this current period from Rodgers is much better is wrong.

If you can't create a capable squad after three full seasons in charge then you shouldn't be at a club the size of Liverpool. The job has run away from him.

[chadrtc]

I've seen worse under Hodgson. Much worse, but that's my opinion.

[frank the tank]

Any interview with Rodgers yet?

i wouldnt be surprised if Brendan's only post match words tonight are "ehhhh......Gary.......why dont you take this one again"

[Venton]

Did Rodgers just throw Gomez under the bus in that interview?

[danperkins]

Many performances under Rodgers have been just as bad and Hodgson didn't get £300m to spend. He inherited a team in free fall. He wasn't a good enough manager, far too old school & had to go. But to suggest this current period from Rodgers is much better is wrong.

If you can't create a capable squad after three full seasons in charge then you shouldn't be at a club the size of Liverpool. The job has run away from him.

absolutely

[Roboklopp]

I've seen worse under Hodgson. Much worse, but that's my opinion.

Bodge didn't spend £300m. How many times are you gonna roll out the nadir of the club in living memory as justification for this utter bilge?