Selling Crouch?

[Delinquent]

I post anywhere there are decent posters, and REFUSE to get embroiled in any anti-KT b0ll0cks with any of the lemmings on the web.

The only think I don't really like about this place is a few too many virulent anti-KT retards, and its close links to that hapless fcuking loon "rupert" on the loonyblog. I don't like giving that cnut any ammunition for his deranged ramblings.

I don't care too much for the politics either, really. If I did, I'd have left KT years ago. And I have no idea what you're on about with regards to rupert, but with a name like that, he was probably doomed from the outset.

[Rich]

Yeah who is that Rupert? Is the one from Hong Kong who wanted to force his new born into being a vegetarian?

Good shout, it might be him. Don't know though.

[Bob]

Yeah who is that Rupert? Is the one from Hong Kong who wanted to force his new born into being a vegetarian?

**** i remember that, "you all just dont understand me claptrap"! I really can't remember his alias though.

Re the anti KT stuff, it amazes me how anyone can devote so much time to that waste of bandwidth. I have it on authority that the author is actually sound though he reads like a bona fide retard.

Oops hes a mod isn't he? - that's me ****ed then

[brendan]

**** i remember that, "you all just dont understand me claptrap"! I really can't remember his alias though.

Re the anti KT stuff, it amazes me how anyone can devote so much time to that waste of bandwidth. I have it on authority that the author is actually sound though he reads like a bona fide retard.

Oops hes a mod isn't he? - that's me ****ed then

All of the REALLY embarrassing stuff on there is usually credited to "rupert", who also sent some rather embarrassing e-mails to Ryan.
He's a bit of a weird cnut, by all accounts.

[Bob]

Pah, this is all lost on me. I spent a while on the blog and soon lost the will the live - It was touch and go for a while.

[G_Man]

Yep, daft thread. Whatever next? A thread entitled "Selling Sissoko?"?

Yeah it dismays me to see people starting threads with a semi-reasonable title, just so they can have a pop at our players.
Criticism of LFC players should be constructive, whereas most of the nonsense on here is destructive to the lad's confidence.
I actually think some of the moronic mantras trotted out by the unholy trinity on here are designed to make him fail and they won't be happy, or quiet, until the lad does fail
It's getting tiresome now, if you really want to make an internet name for yourself by being objectionable and antagonistic then please do it for all players rather than one or two ; or better still **** off to Old Trafford with all the rest of the LFC haters.

[Rich]

G Man, I think all LFC fans should have the right to express their opinion regarding any player - as long as they can back up their claims and justify what they are saying.

And, my personal opinion, is that criticism of Crouch is potentially justified - even if I don't personally agree with it. This thread, unfortunately, de-generated into tit for tat slanging at times. That is nothing, but tedious and dull.

[G_Man]

Is this the sort of place that thinks it's OK to call a LFC and England striker a "goofy lumering (whatever that means) impotent oaf" ?

That's just plain nasty. Goofy? Well that's relevant to selling him. Lumering? I presume he means lumbering and as we've seen he covered more ground than Stevie G. Impotent? Well Ryan must be speaking from personal experience unless he has seen Crouch's medical records. Again I fail to see how that is relevant to selling him. Oaf? Well that's also difficult word to define but it is quite clearly an insult put in there for the sake of it.

So please, enlighten me, is Crouch a goofy, lumering, impotent oaf and is this criticism justified. If you think it is then this site has gone down in my estimation.

[G_Man]

Is this more justified criticism Rich?

Rodders is slower than a ****ing glacier, is **** in the air, has zero aggression, and is a very poor finisher

Watching him run and kick makes my toes curl.

He's an eyesore

[Rich]

G Man, apologies if I didn't make make clear my meaning....

Justifiable criticism of Crouch is for his goal scoring record last year and the fact he didn't contribute many official assists - in this way, it is justifiable to have a go at Crouch.

The name calling and the rest of it, isn't clever and isn't what we want on this site.

I hope this clears up what I meant?!?

[G_Man]

Guess it was me who didn't make myself clear in the first place. I should have said:

If the unholy trinity want to make a name for themselves by calling our players names, they should **** off to Old Toilet where they will be appreciated.

[Rich]

Is this more justified criticism Rich?

Nope!

[Leonard Crowley]

Who are the unholy trinity? I assume Brendan and Ryan because they've been quoted but who's the other demon?

[Shaggy]

Who are the unholy trinity? I assume Brendan and Ryan because they've been quoted but who's the other demon?

You're hoping it's you, aren't you?

[Rosco]

Reveal...

Garcia's success rate with passes 71%, Crouch's 65%.