27-06-13, 03:06 PM
|
#1
|
Benitez
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 930
|
Holly Willoughbooby
Apparently the BBC have received over 100 complaints from viewers regarding Holly Willoughby's low cut dress she wore on the final of The Voice....when asked to comment their spokesperson said 'its nothing much... just a little storm in a DD cup' :-)
__________________
'and boy could he play!.
|
|
|
30-06-13, 08:20 AM
|
#2
|
Prosecco Socialist
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 62,564
|
I heard it's now over 150 complaints now.
Bloody ridiculous.
__________________
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
|
|
|
30-06-13, 11:35 AM
|
#3
|
Pantomime Villain
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 16,277
|
To be fair 120 of the complaints were from me. I wanted to see more.
__________________
Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won’t expect it back. Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
30-06-13, 11:36 AM
|
#4
|
Still Blames Thatcher
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 24,691
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTheCharmer
To be fair 120 of the complaints were from me. I wanted to see more.
|
|
|
|
30-06-13, 11:42 AM
|
#5
|
Prosecco Socialist
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 62,564
|
__________________
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
|
|
|
30-06-13, 03:49 PM
|
#6
|
Paisley
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,444
|
Are we getting more puritanical, or is it just Paul Dacre? Because I remember some of the shit Marti Caine wore presenting New Faces, and you didn't require a lot of imagination to fill in the gaps.
|
|
|
01-07-13, 07:52 PM
|
#7
|
Prosecco Socialist
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 62,564
|
I don't think Paul Dacre can be. Have you seen Mail Online?
__________________
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
|
|
|
01-07-13, 08:27 PM
|
#8
|
Paisley
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,444
|
Aye, that's the inherent hypocrisy. He loves starting a populist moral crusade, but presides over a pornographic site.
|
|
|
01-07-13, 08:29 PM
|
#9
|
Est's Streaker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,764
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollowman
Are we getting more puritanical, or is it just Paul Dacre? Because I remember some of the shit Marti Caine wore presenting New Faces, and you didn't require a lot of imagination to fill in the gaps.
|
we had to be a lot more resourceful in the days before the internets. You really had to earn that orgasm.
|
|
|
01-07-13, 10:23 PM
|
#10
|
Fagan
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,985
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helios Creed
we had to be a lot more resourceful in the days before the internets. You really had to earn that orgasm.
|
yes, can't say I miss carrying that fukin massive Kays catalogue to the bog
__________________
Keep this quiet 
if you carefully grind off the edges of a 50p coin you can use it as a 10p
|
|
|
02-07-13, 12:39 AM
|
#11
|
Daddy day care
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,378
|
catalogue wank
__________________
Champions of Europe and the World. removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all, but not VVD or Alisson
|
|
|
02-07-13, 07:12 AM
|
#12
|
Paisley
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 44,172
|
__________________
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
|
|
|
02-07-13, 03:35 PM
|
#13
|
Dalglish
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,030
|
Thought there'd be more pictures in here!!
__________________
'The tide is very much in our court now.'
Keegan
|
|
|
02-07-13, 03:39 PM
|
#14
|
Dan Ashcroft
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 51,624
|
Really?
Quote:
Who Posted?
Total Posts: 13
User Name Posts
Neil Young 3
Hollowman 2
...
|
__________________
Kick VAR out of football.
Last edited by Kenneth; 02-07-13 at 03:45 PM.
|
|
|
02-07-13, 04:26 PM
|
#15
|
Big Girl's Blouse
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,335
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tufty
yes, can't say I miss carrying that fukin massive Kays catalogue to the bog 
|
My parents had the Freeman's catalog. I was weird even back then, I used to get a thrill from the maternity bras
|
|
|
02-07-13, 04:29 PM
|
#16
|
Daddy day care
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norbs
My parents had the Freeman's catalog. I was weird even back then, I used to get a thrill from the maternity bras
|
are you Slinky in disguise
__________________
Champions of Europe and the World. removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all, but not VVD or Alisson
|
|
|
02-07-13, 04:30 PM
|
#17
|
Big Girl's Blouse
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,335
|
Have you ever seen a peak-a-boo maternity bra? Phroar
|
|
|
02-07-13, 04:32 PM
|
#18
|
Shankly
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,064
|
Is this what all the fuss is about? Really?! Ridiculous....
__________________
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”
Bob's Miserable Bastards Club Member #2
|
|
|
02-07-13, 04:40 PM
|
#19
|
Daddy day care
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,378
|
i do appreciate her communication and presentation skills
__________________
Champions of Europe and the World. removing all the weak links makes us stronger
too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all, but not VVD or Alisson
|
|
|
02-07-13, 04:42 PM
|
#20
|
Big Girl's Blouse
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,335
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yozza
Is this what all the fuss is about? Really?! Ridiculous....
|
Lol, I hadn't seen that before.
My fantasy is a show that has both her and Kelly Brook doing daft things in more revelaing tops. Oh, hang on a minute
|
|
|
04-07-13, 10:00 PM
|
#21
|
Evans
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 201
|
|
|
|
04-07-13, 10:03 PM
|
#22
|
Dressed up as Batman?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 131,091
|
That woman is a fucking disgusting pig, no more than a professional troll.
__________________
Fucking chances, goals
|
|
|
04-07-13, 10:06 PM
|
#23
|
El Pistolero
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 35,786
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy
That woman is a fucking disgusting pig, no more than a professional troll.
|
Judging children by their names. Unbelievable.
__________________
"Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley
|
|
|
04-07-13, 10:29 PM
|
#24
|
Has left his site in good hands...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,263
|
She can't be for real?
|
|
|
04-07-13, 10:31 PM
|
#25
|
Paisley
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 24,840
|
She was a lunatic on Apprentice so she probably is.
__________________
Lot and lots of points still to go. We're going to win it for a 7th time instead.
|
|
|
04-07-13, 10:55 PM
|
#26
|
Meh
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 35,587
|
Wow, surely she'll watch this back and be horrified by her comments.
Judging a child by his or her name FFS
Toxic woman and I feel sorry for her kids
|
|
|
04-07-13, 11:05 PM
|
#27
|
Dressed up as Batman?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 131,091
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcasemore
Wow, surely she'll watch this back and be horrified by her comments.
Judging a child by his or her name FFS
Toxic woman and I feel sorry for her kids
|
I hate to link to this but if you've ever read it you'll know she doesn't seem to give a fuck about her own kids anyway.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/ar...ring-bits.html
__________________
Fucking chances, goals
|
|
|
04-07-13, 11:17 PM
|
#28
|
The Wisp
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 20,681
|
She's vile.
__________________
Hello mert.
|
|
|
04-07-13, 11:19 PM
|
#29
|
Meh
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 35,587
|
Wow, what a horrible narcissistic woman, completely self absorbed
I feel so sorry for her kids
|
|
|
04-07-13, 11:47 PM
|
#30
|
Hodgsoned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,076
|
Most programmes on TV have no point and seem to have angry people not making much sense.
|
|
|
05-07-13, 12:41 AM
|
#31
|
Paisley
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,479
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy
|
I'd disagree. she's clearly not a touchy feely mummy but the fact she as back-up nannies to make sure it's always someone who knows the children and fetches in a regular tutor to give the kids an advantage at their no doubt already high fee school would indicate that she does care.
The way shes phrased it makes her sound like a bit of a witch, but it's almost as though shes trying to get a bite out of it.
The underlying point is a good one. Really, what is she doing wrong? Is she not allowed to be a successful woman with a career?
And why is it her responsibility to look after the kids, and her being neglectful, and not her husband? Surely this day and age the same rules should apply for both parents.
She seems like an utterly horrendous excuse for a human being, but to attack her love of her children for choosing a career is a bit 1980's.
|
|
|
05-07-13, 12:50 AM
|
#32
|
Paisley
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 24,840
|
__________________
Lot and lots of points still to go. We're going to win it for a 7th time instead.
|
|
|
05-07-13, 01:01 AM
|
#33
|
Paisley
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 24,840
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EwarWoo
The underlying point is a good one. Really, what is she doing wrong?
|
Teaching her children to be a bigoted snob and stopping them from making friends with who they want? Showing that she is not capable of compromising her wishes to give them the time of day herself? Great so she splashes the cash for them. Maybe her kids want a bit of love off her instead of an open cheque book?
Basically the only parenting she seems to bother with is to tell her kids that they can't be friends with someone because they have a 'working class name'. They must hate her. Much like her step daughter seems to.
__________________
Lot and lots of points still to go. We're going to win it for a 7th time instead.
|
|
|
05-07-13, 04:19 AM
|
#34
|
Paisley
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,479
|
But the article doesn't state that. The nanny is off duty at 7:30, so clearly she spends time with the kids until bedtime. And for all the article covers she could be with the kids as soon as she arrives home from work and the nanny is spending the last hour or 2 tidying up. And then there's weekends.
Assumptions are being made.
If it's because shes an ugly bigotted person fine, if it's because shes a woman having a career whilst having kids not so.
Last edited by EwarWoo; 05-07-13 at 04:21 AM.
|
|
|
05-07-13, 10:00 AM
|
#35
|
Fagan
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,359
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EwarWoo
I'd disagree. she's clearly not a touchy feely mummy but the fact she as back-up nannies to make sure it's always someone who knows the children and fetches in a regular tutor to give the kids an advantage at their no doubt already high fee school would indicate that she does care.
The way shes phrased it makes her sound like a bit of a witch, but it's almost as though shes trying to get a bite out of it.
The underlying point is a good one. Really, what is she doing wrong? Is she not allowed to be a successful woman with a career?
And why is it her responsibility to look after the kids, and her being neglectful, and not her husband? Surely this day and age the same rules should apply for both parents.
She seems like an utterly horrendous excuse for a human being, but to attack her love of her children for choosing a career is a bit 1980's.
|
I tend to agree with these comments. She is looking after number one and the very fact that she even applied to go on Apprentice defines what sort of person she is. A Self Serving, Publicity seeker who yearns to be famous or loved or whatever...
However she also does want the best for her kids, even if she expresses herself poorly, she is also direct and honest. I much prefer people that speak their minds honestly than people who pretend to care but in reality dont give a fuck aslong as they are seen to be caring.
Some of her comments like she needs to be like a man to succeed, are now getting outdated. As a single father of four kids we all have to balance out life / work decisions.
She is probably rather difficult to work with, she is smug and certainly self conceited, and rather narcissisistic, but I can tell you now, these days this is the majority of people in business.
__________________
Jacques Brel is alive and well and playing at Anfield
|
|
|
05-07-13, 10:26 AM
|
#36
|
Anti-Antipodeanite
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 23,980
|
Blatant WUMerchanty. She's basically a female Adrian Durham.
|
|
|
05-07-13, 08:15 PM
|
#37
|
Passion for fire alarms or extinguishers?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 34,978
|
 ...the bit about naming children after a location...Schofield points out that she has named her own child India haha completely stumps her
Her children will rebel...they will become stoners or goths, have tattoos on their faces and get caught stealing socks from primark
__________________
i own everton fans on the internet....that's what i do
|
|
|
05-07-13, 08:23 PM
|
#38
|
George Soros
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,252
|
__________________
Cheers
Subby
MetalliGear Neo Qube : Ryzen 3600 : Gigabyte x570 Aorus Elite : 32GB Dominator 3600Mhz : Sabrent Gen 4 NVME SSD : Sapphire 5600XT : MasterLiquid 360 : 850w G2 : CableMod custom cables : Win 10
|
|
|
06-07-13, 12:03 AM
|
#39
|
Beside the seaside...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,954
|
Hopkins is a twat...
|
|
|
06-07-13, 01:08 AM
|
#40
|
Paisley
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 24,840
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EwarWoo
But the article doesn't state that. The nanny is off duty at 7:30, so clearly she spends time with the kids until bedtime. And for all the article covers she could be with the kids as soon as she arrives home from work and the nanny is spending the last hour or 2 tidying up. And then there's weekends.
Assumptions are being made.
If it's because shes an ugly bigotted person fine, if it's because shes a woman having a career whilst having kids not so.
|
No, it is because in her own words she is a Thatcherite female who seems to think employment rights for women are...iffy. Someone who thinks a kid is dodgy because of the name given to it by its parent. Someone with a child called India who thinks geographical names are stupid and someone who can't be arsed to go and watch her own child at sports day because it is too much of a chore and gets in with her own life.
That is not an assumption. It is from the horses mouth.
__________________
Lot and lots of points still to go. We're going to win it for a 7th time instead.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 PM.
|