It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

est1892

Go Back   est1892 > Football > Liverpool FC

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-11-19, 07:38 PM   #1
dom9
Ant Pisser
 
dom9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 63,570
Fandom and the toxicity of the Internet

I'm putting this here rather than General Football because I think it's pertinent.

We're on a massive roll as a club right now, but I always feel that we're just a few bad touches away from chucking players, managers and even the club under a bus.

It's not unique to us, and the best known and most extreme version (by far) is AFTV. We love to laugh at them, but they're not so far away from the type of thing that's said in a typical match thread here "in the heat of the moment".

And it's by far this, and every other online forums worst trait, to me at least.

Anyway, have a read of this. I, for one, found it interesting.




https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/28/s....co/40m2KH8Czt



For Fans, by Fans, Against the Club

Arsenal Fan TV is a YouTube sensation. But what makes it a success is not the same thing as what makes Arsenal a success — in fact, it’s often the opposite.





By Rory Smith

Nov. 28, 2019, 1:00 a.m. ET

LONDON — Chris Davies walked out of the Emirates Stadium feeling, he said, as if he was “filled with fire.” As most of his fellow Arsenal fans trudged dolorously away from last Saturday’s 2-2 draw with lowly Southampton, seeking shelter in the pubs of the Holloway Road or the sanctuary of the Tube, he strode toward the statue of Dennis Bergkamp on the perimeter of the club’s North London home.

Plenty of other fans had the same thought. When Davies arrived at the statue, a crowd of several hundred had already gathered. For many of them, this has become part of the ritual of going to the Emirates, the fabric of the matchday experience: a couple of drinks, a bite to eat, watching Arsenal play, and then waiting by the Bergkamp statue to watch the creators of the YouTube channel formerly known as Arsenal Fan TV film their postmatch interviews.

Some come for the spectacle, the circus of it all. Others treat it as a sort of impromptu town hall meeting: They listen to the speakers, debate their points, cheer the claims they like and jeer those they do not. They start chants and shout cutting one-liners. At the end, they may grab a selfie with one of the channel’s regular guests.

But on this Saturday Davies — like many others — had come to speak. He had come to observe before, but this would be his first time as a participant. He felt like he had no other choice. “This is the only outlet fans have,” he said. “Where else are we going to be heard?”


So he took up his place in the crowd. He waited patiently for the channel’s host, Robbie Lyle, to arrive, and for the equipment to be set up. He listened attentively to the regulars as they had their say. And then he was up, the camera’s light on his face: his chance to express his views to the channel’s 1.1 million subscribers.

And Davies let his beloved club have it.

[https://static01]
The Beginning

The story of Arsenal Fan TV — since rebranded as AFTV, reportedly after a polite request from the club not to infringe its copyright — begins, strictly speaking, in 2012. That was when Lyle, then working as a surveyor, first turned up at the Emirates on a matchday with a cameraman and started asking fans for their reaction to what they had just seen. The initial response to the video clips he posted online, he has said previously, was skeptical at best.

That changed, permanently, with Chris Hudson. In 2013, Lyle spoke to Hudson after Arsenal had lost at home to Aston Villa. Hudson’s expletive-laden rant — pointing his finger at the camera, railing against “media luvvies” and demanding the resignation of pretty much anyone he could think of — went viral. AFTV went with it.

Now, the channel is a giant of the genre. It passed a million YouTube subscribers in May. It has its own merchandising line. It has expanded into studio shows and podcasts and inspired imitations and equivalents at pretty much every club in England. Lyle has suggested it is now his full-time job. Last year, he started hosting a program on one of Britain’s national television networks. Many of his regular guests appeared with him.

Some of them have become stars in their own right. It is them that many of the crowd come to see and, more important, to hear. A galaxy of phones are thrust into the sky when any of them are interviewed. They are deluged with requests for selfies, or simply for handshakes. They are collared as they try to leave by fans seeking a private audience — mostly to vent about Arsenal and its failings, but sometimes about more personal subjects.

“It’s weird, people approaching us for pictures,” said Troopz, one of the best-known characters (he declined to reveal his real name). “As far as I’m concerned, I’m just a fan, just like them. I just give my opinion on a YouTube channel. It’s elevated us and put us in places you wouldn’t really think of.”

One of those places is in the orbit of some of Arsenal’s players. Troopz cites Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang and Alexandre Lacazette, two of the club’s jewels, as confidantes. Earlier this month, Arsenal was reported to have asked Aubameyang to stop inviting Troopz to watch games from the striker’s private box. “I talk with who I want, whenever I want,” Aubameyang wrote on Instagram in response, ending the post with a middle-finger emoji.

Arsenal’s unease hints at an inherent tension between the club and the channel. Like all fan-generated media, AFTV has taken on some of the characteristics not only of the club it follows, but of the era in which it was born. It rose to prominence during a schism, as fans debated the future of the former manager Arsène Wenger, a time of planes hired to fly over stadiums, banners unfurled and even fights breaking out.

Most of its greatest hits reflect that simmering discontent. Its most popular videos on YouTube, some viewed as many as three million times, follow in Hudson’s footsteps; they have titles like “Troopz Angry Rant” and “Wenger Must Resign.”

That has engendered a feeling among some that, because the medium rewards performative outrage, the chase for YouTube hits incentivizes guests to be more extreme in their views. Troopz denied that — “It’s real, it’s me,” he said — but others are less convinced.

“It doesn’t reflect real fans,” said Glodi Kweme, watching AFTV record after attending his first Arsenal game. “People use it to say something outlandish so they can get known.” Another fan, Jordan Louis, called it “clout-chasing.”

More troublingly, there is a belief within the club that what is good for Arsenal and what is good for AFTV are two very different things. “It is so wrong for someone who claims to be a fan and their success is fed off a failure,” defender Héctor Bellerín said at an event at the Oxford Union last year. “How can that be a fan?”

Bellerín acknowledged he has no problem with “people hustling, trying to make money their way,” but some within the club’s hierarchy disagree. To AFTV’s regulars, however, what they say on the channel is simply a response to what is happening to the team. “It reflects the club,” Troopz said. “When things were good last year, nobody talked about how we were praising the team.”

To the channel’s critics, though, including those inside Arsenal, it is the other way around. The atmosphere at the Emirates is volatile and fractious, and the club is only ever one bad result from a crisis, in part because of the performative outrage on YouTube. Nobody is quite sure which is the chicken, and which is the egg.

Time to Go

About 30 minutes after Saturday’s match, there is barely space to move between the Bergkamp statue and an adjacent merchandising store when a cheer goes up and Lyle appears. It has been a bad day for Arsenal, a late Lacazette equalizer rescuing a solitary point at home. That should mean a good day for content.

Lyle is a good interviewer: He is patient, rarely interjects, and allows his subjects to range. He will publish 20 videos from this recording session, none of them more than five minutes long, but he does not rush anyone. They are here to talk. He gives the impression he is happy to listen.

Most of them cover the same ground — there is a groundswell of opinion that the current manager, Unai Emery, has to go, and that failure to act now reflects poorly on the club’s board — but there are a couple of flourishes: One man ostentatiously throws his season ticket away; a regular reveals he left his son at home on his 9th birthday because he knew Arsenal would ruin his day.


Manager Unai Emery is a frequent target of Arsenal fan outrage.Credit...Yui Mok/Press Association, via Associated Press

The crowd roars with approval. There are sporadic chants of “time to go.” It is part pantomime, part public forum, part psychiatrist’s couch. “The majority of them are quite fair,” said Faizaan Firozdin, watching from the back. “What they say is what most of the fans are thinking.”

The channel’s followers believe that gives it a power and a relevance. Davies is “100 percent” convinced that it was the compelling evidence of AFTV that forced the club’s hand and finally ended Wenger’s 20-year tenure as manager. Firozdin is adamant that “the main guys’ voices are heard” by the players, and by their employers.

Quite how far that power goes, though, is a different matter. “The internet and reality are two different things,” Troopz says. The Southampton game is the first time, he says, that he has heard voluble dissatisfaction with Emery inside the stadium, though it had been bubbling online for months. If the sense of crisis is bleeding into real life, then that is not because of what the internet has said; it is because of how badly the team is playing.

Lyle stays in position for a couple of hours, interviewing everyone who wants to speak. By the end, the crowd has dwindled a little. Most of those who came for the circus have moved on, their appetite for rubbernecking satiated. Those who remain are the devout and the desperate. Each interview, now, is more of a conversation, not with Lyle, but with those watching.

All of the videos go online that night. The most popular one — with another regular, DT, calling for Emery to be fired immediately — will collect more than 800,000 views in a few days. Firozdin was at the back of the scrum when that was recorded, but the hubbub was too much and the distance too far for him to hear much of it. “It’s O.K.” he says. “I’ll watch it when I get home.”
__________________
Oh I don't know.
dom9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement.
Don't Like Adverts? (Register or Donate)
Liver Bird
Old 28-11-19, 10:51 PM   #2
Irishnev
Shankly
 
Irishnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,748
Thanks for posting - a good read and some comments from me:

The match experience for me is emotional, passionate and tribal plus it brings out irrational spur of the moment thoughts that are at odds with me as person. It’s strange I am normally fairly quiet but my Mrs says it’s the only time she sees ‘real’ emotion in me I would say that I am far calmer now than I was years ago.

The ranting at our players from me such as Lovren, Henderson, Lallana etc isn’t driven by any dislike of them it is driven by a overwhelming desire to win the league and for me they are not good enough (stupid I know) to help us get there. It’s irrational and so at odds with my professional working life and how I am at home. The thing is that is simply spur of the moment non logical emotions and of course when the dust settles I am back in relative normality

I can see the fantastic progress the team is making and this season has been sensational but until we win the league that daft irrational thought will linger in my mind.

Re Arsenal fan tv - they started out as a genuine post match fan show. Now they are almost playing a part for the camera and semi parody. Bad performances mean more views, clicks, hits etc and that is good for business.
Irishnev is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-19, 11:58 PM   #3
Corndog
Fagan
 
Corndog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,601
Why aren't those 3 good enough to be part of a prem winning squad.

One has played in CL and WC finals, he's proven himself at the highest level and is 3rd or 4th choice.

Another (hendo) has continually been part of midfield trios that have dominated world class opposition e.g city or Barca and not just as a one off.

The last one barely gets any game time now but could still be a strong starter for a decent prem side and is like 5th or 6th in the pecking order.

It's all relative but those players aren't even always necessarily starters and all of them have quality.
__________________
Y.N.W.A!!!!!!

"There are two great teams on Merseyside; Liverpool and Liverpool Reserves." - Bill Shankly
Corndog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-19, 12:10 AM   #4
EwarWoo
Paisley
 
EwarWoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,658
It's not just restricted to fandom unfortunately, everyone wants their clicks and views and they get it through drama.

Semi-reputable news sources have stories with 4 lines of write up and a dozen selected Twitter posts most of which are full of melodrama. And our TV screens are filled with staged reality that just intensifies that.

Social media has brought out the worst in people.
EwarWoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-19, 12:32 AM   #5
Irishnev
Shankly
 
Irishnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndog View Post
Why aren't those 3 good enough to be part of a prem winning squad.

One has played in CL and WC finals, he's proven himself at the highest level and is 3rd or 4th choice.

Another (hendo) has continually been part of midfield trios that have dominated world class opposition e.g city or Barca and not just as a one off.

The last one barely gets any game time now but could still be a strong starter for a decent prem side and is like 5th or 6th in the pecking order.

It's all relative but those players aren't even always necessarily starters and all of them have quality.
As I said I’m irrational when it comes to football, I let my prejudice against certain players cloud my judgement. It’s probably why I focus on their errors far more than other players.

It feeds into my main point - football and sport in general is emotive, we as fans (for the most of us ) invest so much into the result that rational thought and behavior can go out the window during a game. Added to the fact that we crave the league so badly makes me even more irrational.

Those three players - I don’t rate them as good enough to start, that’s just my opinion and hence why I am overly harsh on my criticism of them. Irrational stuff - I know
Irishnev is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

  est1892 > Football > Liverpool FC

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Our Current Balance versus Target. Please help us: (Donate)

Kindly Hosted By DigitalWales
Any posts remain the responsibility of the poster. Neither est1892, its Owners nor any company affiliated will be held responsible from any disputes arising from these posts. The views raised are not necessarily those held by the website or its owners.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.