Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

materazzi suing british press.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    materazzi suing british press.

    _____________________________________

    Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

    Think we have the answer..Slot!!

    #2
    anyone remember what they said about it?
    'Of course I didn't take my wife to see Rochdale as an anniversary present.
    It was her birthday.
    Would I have got married during the football season ?
    Anyway, it was Rochdale reserves.'

    Comment


      #3
      If memory serves they suggested that Materazzi had implied Zidane's family were terrorists or something.

      Of course this could be well wide of the mark

      Just found this:


      Marco Materazzi issues writs against British papers
      Italian World Cup winner Marco Materazzi has begun legal proceedings against three British papers he claims libelled him after the 2006 World Cup final. The Inter Milan centre-back is seeking damages from The Sun, Daily Star and Daily Mail over their reports of insults he made to Zinedine Zidane.

      His lawyer, Stephen Heffer, said: "Heffer added: "Marco Materazzi is issuing claims in the High Court against three newspapers, the Sun, the Daily Mail and the Daily Star for damages for libel and an injunction. He is left with no alternative as all three newspapers have failed to correct or apologise for their false reports of the incident. Marco has suffered enormous damage to his reputation as a result of the press reports." Materazzi has claimed his comments referred to Zidane's sister, and not terrorism, Muslims or prostitute mothers as various papers claimed at the time
      Last edited by Gordy Boy; 09-07-07, 04:41 PM. Reason: My memory is better than I thought
      What have I learned, Mr Mackay? Three things. One - bide your time. Two - keep your nose clean. And three - don't let the *******s grind you down

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Gordy Boy View Post
        If memory serves they suggested that Materazzi had implied Zidane's family were terrorists or something.

        Of course this could be well wide of the mark

        Just found this:


        Marco Materazzi issues writs against British papers
        Italian World Cup winner Marco Materazzi has begun legal proceedings against three British papers he claims libelled him after the 2006 World Cup final. The Inter Milan centre-back is seeking damages from The Sun, Daily Star and Daily Mail over their reports of insults he made to Zinedine Zidane.

        His lawyer, Stephen Heffer, said: "Heffer added: "Marco Materazzi is issuing claims in the High Court against three newspapers, the Sun, the Daily Mail and the Daily Star for damages for libel and an injunction. He is left with no alternative as all three newspapers have failed to correct or apologise for their false reports of the incident. Marco has suffered enormous damage to his reputation as a result of the press reports." Materazzi has claimed his comments referred to Zidane's sister, and not terrorism, Muslims or prostitute mothers as various papers claimed at the time
        feck I thought under the common law liable laws you have to have a reputation that can be damaged. After his blue ****e spell any comments fall into the catgory of fair comment...err...melud
        "When Sir Henry broke a fast, you cursed double glazing."

        Comment

        Working...
        X