:whatever:
-
It's not good because it's rude. It's good because it looks like it's good because it's rude. -
what?
-
... is like Lampard without deflection?Comment
-
England without Gerrard are wank.Originally posted by paulcooper4 View Postwhat?
Sorry, maybe that wasn't as clear as I thought.
It's not good because it's rude. It's good because it looks like it's good because it's rude.Comment
-
That's probably what you should have written.Originally posted by Alpha View Post
Babel fanclub member # 4!!!
**** OFF MOURINHO!!!!!!:whatever:Comment
-
give a ****?'Of course I didn't take my wife to see Rochdale as an anniversary present.
It was her birthday.
Would I have got married during the football season ?
Anyway, it was Rochdale reserves.'Comment
-
Originally posted by Alpha View PostEngland without Gerrard are wank.
Sorry, maybe that wasn't as clear as I thought.
Predictable, unimaginative, just plain dire. Same old story really
Like blood on ironComment
-
England WITH Gerrard are wank in my book alsoOriginally posted by Alpha View PostEngland without Gerrard are wank.
Sorry, maybe that wasn't as clear as I thought.
Comment
-
I rather him to be at home with Carra watching it on TV laughing at these ****s playWhen you feel like you're done, you are not alone........Comment
-
Unlike the inspirational England when Stevie is playing. England are dire full stop.Comment
-
-
All hat and no cattleComment
-
England are wank without Gerrard
England are wank with Gerrard
England are wank
Wankland
I think that takes this argument to it's logical conclusion.
It's not good because it's rude. It's good because it looks like it's good because it's rude.Comment
-
Originally posted by Alpha View PostEngland are wank without Gerrard
England are wank with Gerrard
England are wank
Wankland
I think that takes this argument to it's logical conclusion.
Comment
-
You mean that it wasn't Stevie G bossing the midfield yesterday in the number 4 shirt.
Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 yearsComment
Comment