Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Goal aside i thot he was ****e today, far too ligtweight,,,
"Let me say for the record, I am not a gangster and never have been. Im not the thief who grabs your purse. Im not the guy who jacks your car. Im not down with the people who steal and hurt others. Im just a brother who fight back."
Tupac
He's not that great a talent as it was being reported before. His goal was a fluke also.
It wasn't even his goal.
Since when did the identity of the goalscorer become a matter of opinion rather than fact? The ball hit Tevez on the way in - it's his goal.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
What don't you understand, my Mauritian underachiever?
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
What don't you understand, my Mauritian underachiever?
I wasn't referring to Tevez deflecting the ball or not but pointing to the fact that Robinson should have done better with it with or without the deflection. That's why for me it was a fluke.
And the post being about Nani, I thought I'd chip in with some comments about how I don't rate him.
Comment