Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do Arsenal have the strongest strikeforce in the land?
Given that Van Persie didn't begin his Arsenal career as an orthodox striker, it probably isn't a fair contest but nevertheless, Torres' record is obviously outstanding.
But I don't remember this argument being about goal scoring.
As I remember, you were saying that Torres is world class and Van Persie isn't and that they are from different planets in terms of quality.
As excellent as Torres is, I think that does Van Persie a considerable dis-service.
It's not good because it's rude. It's good because it looks like it's good because it's rude.
Given that Van Persie didn't begin his Arsenal career as an orthodox striker, it probably isn't a fair contest but nevertheless, Torres' record is obviously outstanding.
But I don't remember this argument being about goal scoring.
As I remember, you were saying that Torres is world class and Van Persie isn't and that they are from different planets in terms of quality.
As excellent as Torres is, I think that does Van Persie a considerable dis-service.
You can count on that Van Persie will deliver when he plays. He is a very complete striker, just like Torres, Berbatov and Drogba.
Just believe and you never know what will happen.
According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.
Alpha, it is a good comparison yet it isn't as important as it seems. You do not need a 20 plus goal striker to win the PL. In fact Manures top scorer was Ronaldo when they won and Chelsea relied heavily on Lampard's goals. Its about goals from your midfield and a few from defenders which have made the difference. So whilst you have us lagging behind in the striker department I'd say we have a bigger issue with the fact that we do rely still on Gerrard. Alonso/Masher and our wingers(loose term) need to score more regularly.
Given that Van Persie didn't begin his Arsenal career as an orthodox striker, it probably isn't a fair contest but nevertheless, Torres' record is obviously outstanding.
But I don't remember this argument being about goal scoring.
As I remember, you were saying that Torres is world class and Van Persie isn't and that they are from different planets in terms of quality.
As excellent as Torres is, I think that does Van Persie a considerable dis-service.
I'm talking about strikers who fulfil their main function, scoring goals...
This point-based system is designed to demonstrate the comparitive qualiity of the strike forces of the Premierships top four clubs.
Of course it is subjective - feel free to do your own version.
My analysis shows that while Liverpool and Chelsea have the best strikers (one 10-pointer each), Manchester United have the best partnership (a 9 and an 8-pointer) and Arsenal have the most depth (a 9, 7, 6 and 4-pointer).
Here is the overall table:
1.) Arsenal - 26 points
2.) Man U - 22 points
3.) Chelsea - 20 points
4.) Liverpool - 18 points
That's actually one of the best posts I've seen on here. Spot the **** on. This is why we are annual title talkers and not winniers. Our strike force is nowhere near good enough on the whole which leads us to settling for horrible draws due to poor finishing.
Comment