Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

motd shocker

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    motd shocker



    The BBC was dragged into a fresh row over phone-in competitions after a bookmaker stopped taking bets on Match Of The Day's Goal Of The Season competition.
    Leading bookmaker Blue Square took more than £10,000 in just four hours on a goal by Arsenal's Emmanuel Adebayor against Tottenham Hotspur - when they would expect to take just £5,000 in a week.

    The striker's efforts at White Hart Lane in September had been 9-2 third favourite to top the poll, but even after those odds plummeted to 1-5, bets continued to flood in.

    After traders took more than 400 bets and raised fears the result had been leaked, the bookmakers suspended all betting on the contest on Tuesday afternoon.

    The competition, which sees 10 of the season's best goals judged by a panel of the show's presenters, had only just been reinstated after the BBC's blanket ban on phone-in competitions last year following a series of scandals.

    Viewers are invited to phone or text their selection and can win a prize, usually match tickets, if their choice agrees with that of the experts. Blue Square is the only bookmaker to offer odds on the winning goal.

    Alan Alger, spokesman for Blue Square said: "A first there was the usual level of interest. But by Tuesday afternoon we started to take a high number of bets on Adebayor's goal.

    "It was relentless, and it far outweighed the usual amount we would take on what is essentially a novelty market. You are talking about over 400 punters, when usually we would expect no more than 50.

    "Eventually, we cut the odds to 1-5, but we were still taking bets. People usually only do that when they are sure they are not going to lose. Our traders had the feeling that the result might have been leaked by someone."

    He said Cristiano Ronaldo's free-kick against Portsmouth had been the original favourite, followed by his back-heel against Aston Villa.

    He added: "We are not for one moment suggesting that the BBC were placing the bets."

    A BBC spokeswoman said the winning goal was chosen last Wednesday, but there had been no evidence of a leak.

    "We are talking to Blue Square and if there is enough evidence we will investigate," she said.

    The BBC suspended all phone-related competitions on television, radio and the internet last July, after it emerged that several high-profile programmes had deceived viewers by using fake winners.

    The broadcaster was fined £50,000 by Ofcom after it faked the results of a Blue Peter competition, by allowing a child visiting the studio to pose as a caller, when technical problems stopped real calls getting through to the studio.

    Goal of the Month on Match of the Day was one of the first competitions to return, after the BBC introduced its first code of conduct for competitions and voting on every television and radio programme, and online.

    The guidelines saw the price of calls to BBC programmes using premium rate lines capped at 15p.

    #2
    I wouldn't be suprised to see them change it now so Adebayor's goal won't win! That way everything will look above board
    The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

    Comment


      #3
      It's minor compared to the potential of this:

      Ancelotti punt shows Sky can move markets

      Digger

      * Matt Scott
      * The Guardian,
      * Thursday June 5 2008
      * Article history

      Coverage of Chelsea's search for a new manager by the rolling-news channel, Sky Sports News, has highlighted the potential conflict of interest at the heart of the organisation's business activities.

      When SSN carried the news on Tuesday that Carlo Ancelotti was likely to fill the vacancy left by Avram Grant's departure from the Stamford Bridge club, it invited the Sky Bet commentator, Dale Tempest, on to the channel to talk about betting-market activity. At the time Sky Bet was offering Ancelotti at 4/7 but the news saw those odds backed in to 1/5, according to records on the bookmaker-comparison site, oddschecker.com. There is no suggestion that Sky Bet sought to profit specifically from the news on Sky Sports News. The bookmaker was offering a market in the same way as its commercial rivals and the channel was reflecting a situation that other journalists following Chelsea's attempts to lure Ancelotti also understood to be true. The conflict might arise since unlike other bookmakers, a sister company of Sky Bet - Britain's fastest-growing bookmaker - has the potential to influence movements in "football-special" markets. A spokesman for Sky Sports News stated that Tempest appears on a roster of appearances that includes representatives of other bookmakers such as Bet365 and Ladbrokes and that there are a set of editorial guidelines that maintain the integrity of the channel's output. The spokesman added that Sky Bet is an arm's length company with a separate management team to the broadcast wing of BSkyB and that its contribution is "a fraction" of Sky's overall profits.

      link
      However I doubt this will receive as much coverage as the story about the BBC.
      .
      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



      May the Lord bless this post.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
        It's minor compared to the potential of this:



        However I doubt this will receive as much coverage as the story about the BBC.
        i got aphone call of a mate to say back ancelloti cos they were saying he was getting the job but as i said to him why would sky bet still take bets if it was a "done deal"
        besides that tbh when betting new managers you can hardly if ever get a decent amount on before the bookies fill their pants

        Comment

        Working...
        X