Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mutu ordered to pay Chelsea £12m

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Mutu ordered to pay Chelsea £12m



    For the positive cocaine test. ****ing hell that's gotta hurt no matter who you are.
    "My commitment to Liverpool is 100 per cent. I would die for that Liverpool shirt. I think the club loves me and I feel the same, no matter what the situation." - Pepe Reina, Nov '09.

    #2
    Few lines and he'll be laughing!

    Comment


      #3
      thats one expensive bag of mozam
      i own everton fans on the internet....that's what i do

      Comment


        #4
        Good.No place for drugs in sport.

        In any place infact!
        -----------------------------------------------

        'Football is a simple game based on the giving and taking of passes, of controlling the ball and of making yourself available to receive a pass. It is terribly simple.'

        Bill Shankly.

        Comment


          #5
          OK he was a **** but I really don't see how he owes them £12m because of it
          Like blood on iron

          Comment


            #6
            This one is for NIred1


            That's hard lines
            Originally posted by Gordon Brown
            (1995)
            "A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
              OK he was a **** but I really don't see how he owes them £12m because of it


              It was Chelsea's decision to fire him. Any money they lost because of it is surely their own fault. A normal person in a normal job wouldn't be expected to compensate their employer if they got sacked, whatever the reason.

              Comment


                #8
                That's how much the test costs
                Originally posted by Gordon Brown
                (1995)
                "A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Red Chilli View Post
                  This one is for NIred1


                  That's hard lines


                  Comment


                    #10

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                      OK he was a **** but I really don't see how he owes them £12m because of it
                      £16m they paid for him.He breached the terms of him contract.
                      -----------------------------------------------

                      'Football is a simple game based on the giving and taking of passes, of controlling the ball and of making yourself available to receive a pass. It is terribly simple.'

                      Bill Shankly.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by kop-al-74 View Post
                        £16m they paid for him.He breached the terms of him contract.
                        Chelsea didn't suffer damage to the tune of £12m because Mutu snorted coke. They were just rich and illiberal enough to be prepared to write off an asset to make a point. Now they're having their cake and eating it.
                        Like blood on iron

                        Comment


                          #13
                          He will never ever have to pay it, its just another case of fifas kangaroo court system, as soon as he takes it to civil court they will laugh it out.

                          ****ing jokers honestly.
                          RAFA

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                            Chelsea didn't suffer damage to the tune of £12m because Mutu snorted coke. They were just rich and illiberal enough to be prepared to write off an asset to make a point. Now they're having their cake and eating it.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              They terminated his contract because he breached the terms of it, therefore they are entitled to claim a) a portion of the money they paid for him and b) the wages they paid him whilst he was breaching his contract. Whilst they are unlikely to get the transfer fee (or the proportion of it which roughly equates to 3 years out of the 4 year contract they offered him) they will probably be able to claim back the wages they paid to him. He will be liable for those. He was paid those wages on the understanding that he did not snort lines of coke, which will have been a contractual stipulation.

                              Its not completely unreasonable of them. His behaviour and his breach of the rules cost them 3 years of a 4 year contract which became unviable.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X