Chavs offer £48M for Robinho....world's going mad!

[dom9]

I really do think that rather than talking about salary capping, that someone should finally cap Chelsea's blatant buy at all costs attitude. Manure have spent just short of 1bn since purple nose has been at the helm and the Chavs are not far behind already.
I know that we have spent decent money ourselves but the prices for average players are inflated because we are one of the big 4. That hypocrite Kenyon is prepared to spend £48M on Robinho and not £20M on Arshavin, it's obvious that the Chavs are run by a bunch of idiots with a fat wallet rather than good footballing knowhow and integrity.

That actually sounds quite bitter.

[Ferrrrnando]

That actually sounds quite bitter.

It's incredibly bitter. You'd think an Everton fan had wrote it about us.

However, it's still not far off the truth.

[Parm]

Just stupid money, yes he is a good player, but 48mil does not reflect his ability.
25mil at most.

I think even that figure is very generous. He has had 2 good months in spain this season and is always dropped in favour of Robben.
Cant play as a striker and would struggle as a winger in this league. If the chavs want to go and spend stupid money on them...what is they say about a fool and his money..

[Joe King]

Scholes doesn't make nasty tackles. Every foul he's ever committed is simply the result of well-intentioned over-exuberance, coupled with a heart-warmingly charming inability to time his reckless lunges properly, resulting in the accidental decapitation of numerous overreacting nancy-boy foreigners.
Every foul.
Ever.

[Individuum]

18 mio according to that **** rag

[Van Halen]

It's incredibly bitter. You'd think an Everton fan had wrote it about us.

However, it's still not far off the truth.

Nothing bitter, just stating a fact, I haven't missed many games at Anfield since 1969 and over the years our club ethos has always won the day. In modern times - money always talks, 5 years ago Chelsea were a medium sized club £100 million in debt and team full of has beens and mercenaries. Since then they have spent over £500m on transfers and wages replicating exactly what manure have been doing since 1980. All factual and well researched, once again I say we are Liverpool nothing to be bitter about, it's no longer a level playing field. I started going to Anfield when there were no primadonnas, probably when you were in your nappies.

[dom9]

Nothing bitter, just stating a fact, I haven't missed many games at Anfield since 1969 and over the years our club ethos has always won the day. In modern times - money always talks, 5 years ago Chelsea were a medium sized club £100 million in debt and team full of has beens and mercenaries. Since then they have spent over £500m on transfers and wages replicating exactly what manure have been doing since 1980. All factual and well researched, once again I say we are Liverpool nothing to be bitter about, it's no longer a level playing field. I started going to Anfield when there were no primadonnas, probably when you were in your nappies.

Was it a level playing field when LFC were the richest club around, who bought up all the best players?

Or when Blackburn won the league with Jack Walker's money?

Or when the scum went on their winning streak in the last 18 years (once they started making more money than everyone else)?

[Nic83]

If that ballerina is worth 48mil, I can only imagine what this bulldog here would be worth if I continued playing rather than drinking myself into a sex frenzy

[nebbers]

It isn't new, it happened with £3m for Sutton and £15m for Shearer and Madrid have done it for years.

The point is that if Chelski pay £48m for Robhinio and £80m for Kaka then all future transfers are measured by this mark. It will inflate all future prices and kill off the smaller clubs.

Really think that if we were to bid for Aguero theyd want any less then £30m now?