Peter Crouch

[Guest]

What wouldnt you swap for being top of the league?

I must be tired. I obviously meant I wouldn't swap scoring goals to being top of the league.

... or vice versa.

[Craig_H]

I must be tired. I obviously meant I wouldn't swap scoring goals to being top of the league.

Do you think there's any type of correlation between scoring more goals and having more wins/points?

[Guest]

Do you think there's any type of correlation between scoring more goals and having more wins/points?

If we win 1-0 each game it's still a win.

[Craig_H]

If we win 1-0 each game it's still a win.

But we dont. Nobody does, it's completely impossible.

So do you think there's a correlation between how many goals a team scores, and how often it wins?

[Guest]

But we dont. Nobody does, it's completely impossible.

So do you think there's a correlation between how many goals a team scores, and how often it wins?

It's all about winning. You're all about the wrong semantics Craig, no offence to you.

My point is backed up by us being on top and without being top scorers by any stretch of the imagination.

In any case this thread is about Peter Crouch. I've made my opinion clear that he wasn't good enough for LFC. That's it.

[Craig_H]

It's a simple question fredo, do you think you'll generally stand more chance of winning more games, if you're a team who scores a lot of goals?

Yes or no mate?

[Darth Marty]

Is keane Rafa's diouf?

dont be ****ing daft, diouf is a prize cunt with no class whilst robbie is a true red with class in his boots and in his mannerisms.

Im sure he will find his form and get over this dodgy patch.

[Darkon]

He isn't being missed.

Keane is a better player IMO, more mobile and normally and better goalscorer than Crouch (his past stats in the league shows that).

It's not going for him at the moment but he'll come good. We haven't seen the real Robbie Keane this season.

We are missing Crouch at the moment because Keane has not found his usual goal scoring form.

But Keane is a better player than Crouch and he will come good sooner or later. He is faster, has better movement and positioning. On top of it he is a better finisher. The only thing Crouch does better is winning long balls up the field and holding on to the ball.

I would like to see crouch be in the team, but not at the cost of Keane on form. Crouch took a long time getting his goal tally running for us, and perhaps Keane will take the same.

But on the OP's topic, I am very happy for Crouch's succes

[johnp]

But Keane is?

Crouch scored goals whenever he got a chance in the team.

He also went 19 games without scoring for us when he first came. IIRC it was December-ish before he got his first.

[Craig_H]

He also went 19 games without scoring for us when he first came. IIRC it was December-ish before he got his first.

Yes that's true. During which time, he still made a positive contribution to the team. Keane's been invisible.

[5aq1b]

But Keane is?

Crouch scored goals whenever he got a chance in the team.

Chelsea away last season?

[Craig_H]

Chelsea away last season?

Jesus Christ, i hardly meant literally in every game he played.

[5aq1b]

Jesus Christ, i hardly meant literally in every game he played.

Chill winston i forgot to put the sarcastic smiley at the end of my comment

I get what you mean though about Crouch

[Craig_H]

Chill winston i forgot to put the sarcastic smiley at the end of my comment

I get what you mean though about Crouch

[Nicey]

Is keane Rafa's diouf?

Take that ****ing back