Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vidic deserves ban

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Vidic deserves ban

    According to Jose, Vidic deserves at least a 2 match ban after been sent off int he World Club Championship. Have to say I agree with him. Not just because he plays for the Mancs but because it was a straight red - constituting serious foul play.

    Jellyfish are 97% water or something, so how much are they doing? Just give them another 3% and make them water. It's more useful

    #2
    He will be banned for at least two games if UEFA suddenly don't change the rules.
    Just believe and you never know what will happen.

    According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

    Comment


      #3
      Does anyone know when the decision will be made officially then?
      The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by lucas View Post
        According to Jose, Vidic deserves at least a 2 match ban after been sent off int he World Club Championship. Have to say I agree with him. Not just because he plays for the Mancs but because it was a straight red - constituting serious foul play.

        http://www.football.virginmedia.com/...507179,00.html
        Jose? Are you friends with him?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by MrsB View Post
          Jose? Are you friends with him?
          Damn, should have called him Maureen!
          Jellyfish are 97% water or something, so how much are they doing? Just give them another 3% and make them water. It's more useful

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by lucas View Post
            Damn, should have called him Maureen!
            Either way you're obviously on first name terms with him.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment

            Working...
            X