Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2026 World Cup

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • peterbread
    replied
    Originally posted by Le Chef View Post
    Absolutely loathe Marc Cucurella, epitomises everything that is wrong will football, will fit in at Madrid like a glove
    Absolutely horrible player. The team Jose is putting together is the last team I’d want to watch. I wonder if he can still handle the big personalities while making it all about himself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Le Chef
    replied
    Absolutely loathe Marc Cucurella, epitomises everything that is wrong will football, will fit in at Madrid like a glove

    Leave a comment:


  • SB
    replied
    Originally posted by Norbs View Post
    They're rowing home, they're rowing home, they're rowing, Norway's rowing home
    Welcome back old mate. You been on holiday or something?

    Leave a comment:


  • ChesterDave
    replied
    How bad was the wind because that ball came down near vertical relative to the angle it was kicked.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buzzo
    replied
    Originally posted by Kenneth View Post

    Because it didn’t hit anything maybe? The only evidence that it did seems to be one angle from the end of the pitch, but that was from a moving camera, ie the camera perspective moved and maybe the trajectory of the ball didn’t.

    I’d have some sympathy if it had been and England goal kick, or if there was an obvious advantage to England from any contact, but it was just a random thing, if it happened at all, which I doubt.
    Unless there was a remote control within the ball it definitely hit something. The trajectory completely changes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kenneth
    replied
    I’ve heard a lot of ‘what’s VAR for then’, but I can’t imagine VAR have their cameras set up to point at the sky.

    Leave a comment:


  • Exiled_red
    replied
    Originally posted by Kenneth View Post

    Because it didn’t hit anything maybe? The only evidence that it did seems to be one angle from the end of the pitch, but that was from a moving camera, ie the camera perspective moved and maybe the trajectory of the ball didn’t.

    I’d have some sympathy if it had been and England goal kick, or if there was an obvious advantage to England from any contact, but it was just a random thing, if it happened at all, which I doubt.
    There are a couple of angles I have seen including some which map the trajectory of the ball and from that you can see the ball doesn't travel on a parabolic path which is what you would expect, I guess you could argue spin on the ball or wind or something, I am no expert but the change in trajectory is significant and I would be surprised if an effect that large wasn't due to something external like it hitting a wire.

    The problem with this is the proof has to come from FIFA and I don't trust that FIFA are an open and honest organisation in the information that they will put out. There are their own agendas at play here. I'm not talking about bias for one team or other, but something they care more about - money and reputation. I wouldn't be surprised if this new technology wasn't set up or tested properly, and FIFA don't want to reveal such failures...

    Leave a comment:


  • Norbs
    replied
    They're rowing home, they're rowing home, they're rowing, Norway's rowing home

    Leave a comment:


  • vlahka
    replied
    If we werent getting our beach ball deflection overturned, a cable will be completely ignored.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kenneth
    replied
    Originally posted by peterbread View Post
    From the goal kick before England's goal the ball hit the cables holding the cameras so it shouldn’t have stood.

    If they have sensors to detect the slightest hair flick to disallow a goal why didn’t it happen here?
    Because it didn’t hit anything maybe? The only evidence that it did seems to be one angle from the end of the pitch, but that was from a moving camera, ie the camera perspective moved and maybe the trajectory of the ball didn’t.

    I’d have some sympathy if it had been and England goal kick, or if there was an obvious advantage to England from any contact, but it was just a random thing, if it happened at all, which I doubt.
    Last edited by Kenneth; 12-07-26, 08:54 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Charly
    replied
    All those Premier league players are going to be ****ed... hahahaha

    Leave a comment:


  • BigChief
    replied
    What a sapping game. Players are dying out there. Arsenal need to beat Norway to get two more guaranteed games out of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChesterDave
    replied
    I just don't get how they can get this so wrong with videos

    Leave a comment:


  • Charly
    replied
    Still a foul isnt it?

    Leave a comment:


  • peterbread
    replied
    From the goal kick before England's goal the ball hit the cables holding the cameras so it shouldn’t have stood.

    If they have sensors to detect the slightest hair flick to disallow a goal why didn’t it happen here?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X