Originally posted by dww
View Post
-
Ahh, I see.
-
Originally posted by fredo View PostFactually incorrect? Then never use Google again.
What are you on about?
Comment
-
OK, own up, who voted for Manchester United?.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Nobody, it's on 0%Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
Personally I voted for Old Hairy Hands.Justice for the 96Comment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
not now it's not
So Neil, why do you feel Manchester united are the biggest club in the world?Justice for the 96Comment
-
I have no idea what you mean.
OK, OK, it was the only way to cover my tracks.
And I think fredo said it..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Richard Keys has got 12%.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Well covered up mate, if in doubt blame FredoOriginally posted by Neil Young View PostI have no idea what you mean.
OK, OK, it was the only way to cover my tracks.
And I think fredo said it.
Justice for the 96Comment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
****in embarrassment of a poll. Who the **** voted for man united? thats worse than voting for bnpComment
-
doesn't surprise me to be honestOriginally posted by Neil Young View Post
Justice for the 96Comment
-
So is it safe to assume that I've thrown a big spanner in the real definition of that adjective 'big'?Comment
-
I would say we are in the top 5 for sure .. its a tough one.. before the most recent dealings I would say presently Barca followed by Mancs then Real then us but as it stands now .. its probally Real, Barca, Mancs, Liverpool, Milan, Chelsea, Arsenal, InterAnybody who criticizes Klopp ever is a James Blunt. Nov 2015
#****CITYComment
-
Comment