Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mourinho Whoring Himself to Scum

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Mourinho Whoring Himself to Scum

    Jose Mourinho would jump at the chance of managing Manchester United should the Red Devils decide he is the man to replace Sir Alex Ferguson.

    At 67, Ferguson knows he cannot continue indefinitely, even though he is presently fit and healthy and has no intention of giving up a job he has held for almost 23 years.

    United chief executive David Gill knows finding a suitable alternative will be the single most difficult task he will face given the incredible success Ferguson has enjoyed with the Red Devils.

    Mourinho's name has been mentioned fairly frequently since his exit from Chelsea.

    The Portuguese coach certainly has the charisma required to take on one of football's biggest jobs and is unlikely to be overwhelmed by the task of replacing the most successful British manager of all time.

    And, while he insists he remains totally focused on trying to end Inter Milan's 54-year European Cup drought, he admitted the lure of returning to England with the current Premier League champions would probably be irresistible.

    "I would consider going to Manchester United but United have to consider if they want me to succeed Sir Alex Ferguson," he told the Daily Mirror. "If they do, then of course.

    "I like England, where the fans are very passionate and make the game a beautiful occasion with such an incredible atmosphere."

    Ironically, Mourinho's statement comes just after John Terry committed his future to the Stamford Bridge outfit.

    Had Mourinho still been with Chelsea, it is unlikely Terry would have needed assurances from Roman Abramovich about the future direction of the London outfit before he finally said no to Manchester City.

    And, aside from backroom unrest, it has not escaped Mourinho's notice that since his controversial exit two years ago, Chelsea are now onto their fourth manager and have failed to recapture the title, while he - having guided Chelsea to back-to-back championships - has now won Serie A as well with Inter.

    "I had many conversations before Chelsea and I decided on a divorce," he said. "It was difficult for me because we loved each other but the relationship went in one direction and it was best for everyone.

    "Since I left I became champion again but they have not been champions again. I keep on winning and they don't."


    arrogant prick

    _____________________________________

    Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

    Think we have the answer..Slot!!

    #2
    I like him Jose. He's an interesting character and he's very very funny.

    Comment


      #3
      Nah he's a knob.

      I can see Moyes being the next Scum manager anyway.

      Comment


        #4
        A cunt of the very highest order. Perfect for the Scum.
        "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

        Comment


          #5
          Why he's a cunt? He's just an entertainer and he's far from stupid. He plays the game the way it should be played, creating rivalries and engagement. Mourihno gone has rendered the premier league poorer IMO.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by fredo View Post
            Why he's a cunt? He's just an entertainer and he's far from stupid. He plays the game the way it should be played, creating rivalries and engagement. Mourihno gone has rendered the premier league poorer IMO.
            He is disrespectful, arrogant, self centred and I just find him offensive. And his disrespect to Liverpool FC and Rafa cements my ill feeling towards him.
            "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Tee View Post
              He is disrespectful, arrogant, self centred and I just find him offensive. And his disrespect to Liverpool FC and Rafa cements my ill feeling towards him.
              Haven't you thought one minute that he's just playing a game? He does this to create engagement and increase the competitive spirit of his teams and the sport in general. I think he's brilliant for the game, but I can also understand that it can rile up some people.

              Shankly was a bit like that, though he used wit rather than blatant provocation.

              Comment


                #8
                So lying about a fellow manager and a referee latterly helping to force the ref to retire is just playing a game?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by fah-q View Post
                  So lying about a fellow manager and a referee latterly helping to force the ref to retire is just playing a game?
                  I think he pushed this too far and he gets carried away with things. It's hardly a criminal offence anyway mate. My point is that people should realize that football is a game, yes with a lot of passion and money, but it is just a game at the end of the day, win or lose.

                  That is why I am also oblivious of Ferguson's ramblings. Let them talk, this is done for specific purpose, so as to invite a response or make other managers lose control. To get back to Fergie's latest rants, I think Mark Hughes handled them brilliantly. That should be the way to do it. This is just talk at the end of the day and what matters is what happens on the pitch. That's where the important talking has to be made and to be fair to both Ferguson and Mourihno, they both have the success on it to back up their talk.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    He's very pro-dog I seem to recall.
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      There is a line and he crossed it, comparing his conduct with Shanks is just plain wrong.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by fah-q View Post
                        There is a line and he crossed it, comparing his conduct with Shanks is just plain wrong.
                        I agree but I was talking about Mourinho, not fredo.
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                          He's very pro-dog I seem to recall.
                          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                          I agree but I was talking about Mourinho, not fredo.
                          Okay can we try and not do this in every thread?

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Reece View Post
                            Okay can we try and not do this in every thread?


                            Look at my new avatar, it says it all.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              And Reece, please remove the 'Dog's Bollocks' reference underneath my real title.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X