Spurs aim for new stadium by 2012

[dom9]

She's not cabin crew mate and doesn't fly around the world everyday.

OK, fair enough, but she works for a polluting airline.

[Fredo]

OK, fair enough, but she works for a polluting airline.

Yes and she knows my stance on this.

Then, I wouldn't have met her had it not been for this polluting airline, that's the argument she always throws at me when I'm winning.

[dom9]

Yes and she knows my stance on this.

Then, I wouldn't have met her had it not been for this polluting airline, that's the argument she always throws at me when I'm winning.

So, you're prepared to bend your rules on carbon emissions when it suits your personal life.

Hypocrisy.

[Neil Young]

Yes and she knows my stance on this.

Then, I wouldn't have met her had it not been for this polluting airline, that's the argument she always throws at me when I'm winning.

Your imagination is more vivid than I thought possible.

[Fredo]

So, you're prepared to bend your rules on carbon emissions when it suits your personal life.

Hypocrisy.

Your imagination is more vivid than I thought possible.

What's wrong with that, I don't need you to tell me of the harsh reality of life.

[Neil Young]

What's wrong with that, I don't need you to tell me of the harsh reality of life.

Quite. My point entirely.

[Fredo]

Quite. My point entirely.

So, Spurs stadium yes no yeah?

[dom9]

Is the correct answer for me.

What pisses me off even more, is why neither club came in from the start, the stadium design could have been done more to suit then, saving even more cash for the tax payer.

You do realise that West Ham will knock down at least 80% of the stadium too.

Is that acceptable?

[Neil Young]

So, Spurs stadium yes no yeah?

No.

[Fredo]

No.

We aren't too far apart my old friend.

[Vermilion]

You do realise that West Ham will knock down at least 80% of the stadium too.

Is that acceptable?

The seating has to be reduced. It's a whole lot less than scarpping all the infrastructure, the surrounding area etc, and turning the whole thing around starting from scratch in an area they don't really belong in as a club.

The lesser of two evils is all. I'd rather a way was found of making it GB's athletics venue only.

[Neil Young]

We aren't too far apart my old friend.

FLMAO

[dom9]

The seating has to be reduced. It's a whole lot less than scarpping all the infrastructure, the surrounding area etc, and turning the whole thing around starting from scratch in an area they don't really belong in.

It's a lot more than that.

They will install executive boxes, concessions, turnstiles, as well removing the whole top tier, and a large proportion of the bottom tier to accommodate this.

[Vermilion]

It's a lot more than that.

They will install executive boxes, concessions, turnstiles, as well removing the whole top tier, and a large proportion of the bottom tier to accommodate this.

And a lot less than Spurs intend.

As i said in my above post, lesser of two evils, it's crazy it's even come to this, as i say, both clubs should have come in at the design stage, that's when this should have been sorted.

Anyway, as riveting a subject as this is , we're going in circles now.

[dom9]

And a lot less than Spurs intend.

As i said in my above post, lesser of two evils, it's crazy it's even come to this, as i say, both clubs should have come in at the design stage, that's when this should have been sorted.

Anyway, as riveting a subject as this is , we're going in circles now.

Agree with your second point.