Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obsessed Mancs blame us for Rio appeal failure

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Obsessed Mancs blame us for Rio appeal failure



    Manchester United will cite the example of Liverpool's Javier Mascherano when they appeal against Rio Ferdinand's increased ban for violent conduct.

    The 31-year-old's three-match ban was extended to four after the Football Association labelled the defender's initial appeal as "frivolous".

    United say Mascherano got away without being charged for what they believe was a similar incident against Leeds.

    But the ban could be increased when the appeal board meets on 12 February.

    If that happens, Ferdinand will be ruled out of the Carling Cup final against Aston Villa on 28 February at Wembley.

    Liverpool midfielder Mascherano caught striker Jermaine Beckford on the head back in September and Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson said: "The concern is the word frivolous.

    "The two most experienced referees in the Premier League are Alan Wiley and Steve Bennett.

    "They are under the same controls and the same directions. One says yes (Bennett), in the case of Rio, and one says no (Wiley), in the case of Javier Mascherano against Leeds United when he punched the player in the back of the head.

    "When you see that example, we don't think our appeal was frivolous."

    Ferdinand only returned to action at Old Trafford against Hull for the first time in three months after recovering from a calf injury.

    But after appearing to swing an arm at Hull striker Craig Fagan, the England centre-half picked up a three-match ban, which was then extended to four after the FA rejected the defender's appeal.

    Because of the appeal, Ferdinand, who has made only 10 appearances for his club so far this season, was able to play in the Carling Cup semi-final win over Manchester City.

    His ban began at the Emirates against Arsenal on Sunday and he will definitely miss the next Premier League matches with Portsmouth and Aston Villa.

    If Ferdinand is successful in overturning the extra match ban then he will be available for the clash at Everton on 20 February.

    United boss Sir Alex Ferguson expressed his displeasure last week with the disciplinary processes being used by the game's governing body.

    The Scot said at the time there were "conflicting ways in how these decisions are being viewed".

    He added: "I watched the game between Leyton Orient and Charlton (on Monday 25 January) and there was an elbow on the Charlton player three times as he was running with the ball.

    "But nothing has happened with that. There is a lot of confusion there."

    The United defence has been ravaged by injury for much of the season with Nemanja Vidic, Gary Neville, John O'Shea and Wes Brown all spending lengthy periods on the sidelines.
    Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

    #2
    to be fair the rules should be consistent for everyone.

    I hate the way the FA adds a game ban on just for daring to appeal a decision they've made.

    But in this instance I hope they increase it to 6 games and sew his rubber duck lips together and staple his arsehole shut for the sheer audacity of appealing whilst looking so ****ing ugly.
    Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won’t expect it back. Oscar Wilde

    Comment


      #3
      right - so lets get this straight - ferdindand threw a dig at someone - after the game, it was reviewed and he was given a three match ban - united appeal, so he was given four match ban, so they are now appealing again! - dickheads - be funny if the fa give him a five match ban and offer united to appeal it once more with the notion that they will just keep extending it haha
      i own everton fans on the internet....that's what i do

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by BobTheCharmer View Post
        to be fair the rules should be consistent for everyone.

        I hate the way the FA adds a game ban on just for daring to appeal a decision they've made.

        But in this instance I hope they increase it to 6 games and sew his rubber duck lips together and staple his arsehole shut for the sheer audacity of appealing whilst looking so ****ing ugly.
        But the frivolous nature of this appeal was clearly designed to enable Ferdinand to play in the 2nd leg of the City game. They deserved it, it took the piss.
        Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

        Comment


          #5
          Rafa should send Mascherano around to old trafford/training ground to slap the **** out of fergie.

          Comment


            #6
            laughable
            Justice for the 96

            Comment


              #7
              can the FA increase it again?
              Play Ball!!!!!!!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                But the frivolous nature of this appeal was clearly designed to enable Ferdinand to play in the 2nd leg of the City game. They deserved it, it took the piss.
                aye - thats exactly how i took it, and why the fa gave him the 4th game ban - united tried to be clever, used the appeal to allow ferdinand to play against city - and now they are trying to worm their way out
                i own everton fans on the internet....that's what i do

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by PTP View Post
                  aye - thats exactly how i took it, and why the fa gave him the 4th game ban - united tried to be clever, used the appeal to allow ferdinand to play against city - and now they are trying to worm their way out

                  Exactly, for once Marky I agree with you
                  Justice for the 96

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X