Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Premier League proposes new compensation deal for young players

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Premier League proposes new compensation deal for young players

    • Teams would receive fixed rates of compensation
    • Reduced risk may encourage teams to sign English players

    * Press Association
    * guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 12 May 2010 14.49 BST


    Tottenham were ordered to pay £700,000 for John Bostock, but he is yet to break into their first team. Photograph: Steven Paston/Action Images

    The Premier League are pressing for a major change in the way smaller clubs are compensated for youth players in a move which could boost the number of English players in the top flight.

    The league is proposing a fixed level of compensation for young players who are snapped up before they have signed a professional contract at the age of 16. The planned system would see more compensation money tied to 'add-ons' - such as playing for the first team, making a fixed number of performances and playing at Under-21 and senior international level.

    The Premier League accept that the initial fee for young players will often be less than would be received under the current tribunal system, but believe it will often work out more in the longer term.

    Some League One and Two chairmen fear that the new system will open the floodgates to poaching by top clubs but the Football League clubs have had to agree to a review of the system as part of their acceptance of a package for solidarity payments - including parachute payments of £48m being paid over four years. Premier League chiefs, who insist they will not impose the new system without Football League agreement, hope it will stop clubs going to France and the rest of the continent where compensation is cheaper, because there would be less of a risk in taking on English youngsters even if they fail to make the grade.

    Clubs in the top-flight will be obliged to have at least eight 'home-grown' players in their 25-man squads from next season. The first effect of the new system would be to rank clubs' academies, with more compensation to be paid for a youth player from a four-star rated academy compared to a three, two or one-star academy.

    The most recent high-profile tribunal decision for a youth player was for midfielder John Bostock two years ago, when Tottenham Hotspur were ordered to pay Crystal Palace £700,000 for the player who was then 16. The then Palace chairman, Simon Jordan, was furious at the level of the fee, claiming Bostock was "world class", but the midfielder has not broken into the Spurs team and has had mixed success on loan at Brentford.
    "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
    -- William Blake

    #2
    Premier League looking after number 1! THe prem is going to be the death of english football!

    Comment


      #3
      Aye. Every year the PL organisation looks more and more of a bad thing for football in general.
      "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
      -- William Blake

      Comment


        #4
        Self centred ****s.................

        Comment


          #5
          Seems pretty reasonable to me.
          Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Operation View Post
            Seems pretty reasonable to me.
            A lot of lower league teams rely to some greater or lesser extent on selling their academy products - if there is a set fee at a younger ages then big clubs will poach them at younger and younger ages. Whilst the lower league teams might, conceivably make more on some players through the add ons they will lose out through no longer having the numbers of players with talent and on sell on fees etc which have kept many clubs afloat in the past.
            "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
            -- William Blake

            Comment


              #7
              Ignore me.
              Last edited by Kenneth; 13-05-10, 02:08 PM. Reason: Being stupid
              Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by dww View Post
                A lot of lower league teams rely to some greater or lesser extent on selling their academy products - if there is a set fee at a younger ages then big clubs will poach them at younger and younger ages. Whilst the lower league teams might, conceivably make more on some players through the add ons they will lose out through no longer having the numbers of players with talent and on sell on fees etc which have kept many clubs afloat in the past.
                All depends on the details of the add-ons.

                I've no idea what the levels are being considered, but if the amounts for a 1st team appearance are say £500k (Seems fair for a premiership player) another £500k after 30 games. £500k for U21 call up and £1mil for a full cap and 25% of any overall profit made when selling etc then it could work well.

                I remember Wimbledon always used to put sell on clauses when they sold players and were always picking up the odd bit here and there from players who'd left maybe 5 years ago.

                It could work out cheaper for those players that later fail, but more profitable for top level players but be spread more around the lower leagues as the prem clubs gamble more on the youngsters. Probably better for the national team too with more english youngsters at top flight academies with the best coaches.

                Factoring in the 'quality' of the selling clubs academy is a bad idea IMO, it should all be about how the player develops.
                "that is my opinion and that is more important than what anyone else has to say about it" - Mr A.Fergusson, Oct 2011

                Comment


                  #9
                  The problem is with players like Bostock, who are in or close to being in the first team, a deal which is weighted towards future performance, doesn't help the 'selling' club replace the player.
                  The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X