Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Foul play suspected as Kevin Davies is kept out of England picture

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Foul play suspected as Kevin Davies is kept out of England picture

    For the sixth time in seven seasons the Bolton striker has committed more fouls than anyone in the Premier League – no wonder Fabio Capello isn't keen

    Posted by Paul Doyle Thursday 13 May 2010 15.35 BST guardian.co.uk


    Bolton's Kevin Davies, right, committed 121 fouls in the Premier League this season, the highest in the history of Opta records. Photograph: Jonathan Brady/EPA

    Amid all the chinwagging and finger-pointing this week about assorted inclusions and exclusions in England's pre-World Cup squad, one man whose non-selection has provoked no controversy whatsoever is the Bolton striker Kevin Davies. But why? The barrel-chested 33-year-old has long been recognised as one of the most effective targetmen in the Premier League yet Fabio Capello, like his predecessors, has never considered him worthy of even a run-out at a training session.

    Rummage through the data bases of those fine people from Opta statistics and the reason becomes obvious. This season Davies committed more fouls than any other player in the Premier League – again. This is the sixth time in the past seven seasons that he has topped that particular poll, which is really quite impressive. Aston Villa's John Carew managed to interrupt his dominance two years ago but Davies responded to that affront in emphatic fashion – his tally of 121 fouls this season is the highest in the history of Opta records. Way to push for a World Cup spot!

    In his defence, Davies could point to the fact that he is also the victim of many fouls – only Everton's Steven Pienaar was more roughed up than him this season – but the fact remains that Davies's propensity for conceding free-kicks would make him a liability on the international stage.

    Stats do not, of course, provide a full understanding of performances. But poring over Opta's cornucopia of end-of-season figures is, for those of us of an unashamedly geeky disposition, one of the great pleasures of May.

    Who can fail to be intrigued, for example, by the rankings for chance creation? The fact that Arsenal's Cesc Fábregas generated opportunities more frequently than any other player (every 23.1 minutes, apparently) will shock no one, but who is that at No7 in the overall list – behind Ryan Giggs, Florent Malouda, Frank Lampard, Salomon Kalou and Antonio Valencia? Why it's the celebrated Wolves schemer Chris Iwelumo! Sure, he did it over a briefer period than many others but only players who created more than 10 chances are eligible for inclusion in the list and the burly Scot forged an opening every 29.6 minutes, a better rate than Robin van Persie (30.6), Nani (31.1) and, yes, Wigan's Hendry Thomas (212.5).

    The stats also help answer a question that many at Liverpool have long been asking: what is Lucas Leiva for? The much-maligned Brazilian put in more tackles (148, winning 102) this season than all but three other players in the league – though the most prolific tackler remains his team-mate, Javier Mascherano (178, of which he won 144), ahead of Mohamed Diamé of Wigan (176, won 125) and Fabrice Muamba of Bolton (152, won 102).

    There are four Liverpool players in the top 30 most frequent tacklers – more than any other team. Arsenal have only one – Alexandre Song is 23rd, having attempted 88 tackles, one fewer than Birmingham's James McFadden. You might deduce that this is because Arsenal did not need to tackle as much since they tended to have the ball a lot – and it is true that only Chelsea averaged more possession in matches (59.8% to Arsenal's 59.3%). But Liverpool averaged 59.1%. They may have had the ball at their feet quite a bit, but Liverpool also had their heads in their hands a lot – they were denied by the frame of the goal more times (20) than any other team this season.

    One of the starkest trends in the Premier League in recent years has been the increasing importance of set-pieces – the proportion of goals originating from them has leapt by over 7% in the last five years, reaching 36.66% this season. That pattern is perhaps what has convinced Arsène Wenger finally to declare that he will address his team's defensive problems: Arsenal's organisational problems at the back, exacerbated by the lack of a commanding goalkeeper, were reflected in the number of goals they conceded from set-pieces, 23 – only the three relegated sides and Wigan let in more. Perhaps Wenger should turn this summer to Birmingham's Roger Johnson, who made more clearances (440) than any other player in the division this season (Zat Knight was next with 434 before a big gap until you reach Sylvain Distin, 388).

    The main factor in the climb in set-piece goals has been greater accuracy from corners and throw-ins. Last season 11.89% of goals came from corners; this season that figure rose to 13.58%. Manchester City were most dangerous from corners this term, scoring 15 goals (Blackburn were next, with 12). The proportion of goals from throw-ins, meanwhile, has doubled in the last two years – from 1.5% in 2007-08 to 2.94% this season. The obvious conclusion to draw from that is that the figures have been distorted by Stoke. But while it is true that Tony Pulis's troops flung in far more long throws this season than any other team (608 – Wigan were next with 459), they are not the most lethal from them. Their throw-ins led to five goals this season, whereas Bolton scored from six (Grétar Steinsson didn't score any of them, alas – in fact, he had more shots without hitting the target than any other player in the league).

    If you had never seen Stoke play, you could quickly ascertain their style from a look at the stats – snobs may say that is the most entertaining way to watch them. They averaged far less possession per match than any other team (39.6%), made fewer passes (10,314, compared to Manchester United's 19,327), mustered fewer shots, and hit a higher percentage of their passes long than anyone else (21.12%). But Stoke finished well clear of trouble because what they do, they do well: they were, for example, the most accurate crossers in the league (26.76% completion rate when corners are included, just ahead of Chelsea and Aston Villa and way in front of the league's least accurate crossers – Arsenal, on 17.49%).

    Bolton, of course, also like to hit long balls, mostly to our friend Davies. But Owen Coyle has been gradually altering their approach. Before Coyle's arrival in January, they used to resort to long balls even more than Stoke – hitting 22.22% long. Coyle brought that rate down to 18.19%. Over the first 18 matches of the season they averaged 41.48% possession; over the 20 league games with Coyle that figure increased to 44.35%. And that change was not at the cost of physicality, since under Coyle Bolton won 58.49% of duels, compared with 56.58% under Gary Megson.

    Elsewhere, Martin O'Neill's reluctance to rotate his squad as much as many supporters would have liked drew much criticism and was blamed for contributing to Aston Villa's decline towards the end of the season. Not only was O'Neill disinclined to rotate, he did not even like making substitutions – he made only 67 in the league during this campaign, far fewer than anyone else (neighbour Alex McLeish was the next most conservative, making 84 at Birmingham). Blackburn's Sam Allardyce made the most with 110.

    O'Neill, though, was right to show faith in some players. Ashley Young delivered far more crosses than any other player (272 – the next most prolific was Leighton Baines, with 210). Gabriel Agbonlahor, meanwhile, was the most accurate shot-maker in the league: 64.29% of his 56 shots were on target. Nicolas Anelka ran him close with 63.89% from 72 – and the Frenchman was exceptionally accurate from outside the area, with bang on 60% of his efforts finding the target. Only Damien Duff was better from long range (69.57% of shots from outside the area on target) – no one else came close. Indeed, Tottenham fans may have found the new Stefan Freund: a meagre 17.4% of Luka Modric's shots from outside the box were on target.

    Finally, some hope for Cardiff and Blackpool as they prepare to do battle for the right to compete in the Premier League next season: this year 31 points would have been enough to secure survival, the lowest total. In fact, there is rarely any need to reach the mythical 40-point mark: only once in the last 12 seasons would 39 points not have been sufficient (in 2003, when West Ham went down with 42), and usually 35 will do.
    "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
    -- William Blake

    #2
    I suspect it's actually because he's a ****house.

    Comment


      #3
      Interesting.

      Davies is not a dirty player and, as the article points out, is always the most-fouled player too (this only behind Pienaar)...he only gives as good as he gets and clearly it's an opposition ploy to get about Davies and get in his face, so to speak. He's not a ****house at all - can anyone give a single example of appalling dangerous play by Davies? I suspect not.

      I knew we'd had no luck this season but that stat about hitting the woodwork takes the piss.
      Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
        Interesting.

        Davies is not a dirty player and, as the article points out, is always the most-fouled player too (this only behind Pienaar)...he only gives as good as he gets and clearly it's an opposition ploy to get about Davies and get in his face, so to speak. He's not a ****house at all - can anyone give a single example of appalling dangerous play by Davies? I suspect not.

        I knew we'd had no luck this season but that stat about hitting the woodwork takes the piss.
        He's constantly all ****ing elbows. Just ask Sami. He may not do two footed lunges or the like, but I stand by him being a dirty ****house.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
          I knew we'd had no luck this season but that stat about hitting the woodwork takes the piss.
          Especially when you compare it to the Mancs' own goal tally

          Comment


            #6
            Liverpool also had their heads in their hands a lot – they were denied by the frame of the goal more times (20) than any other team this season


            four Liverpool players in the top 30 most frequent tacklers
            Probably because we keep giving the ball away though.

            the most prolific tackler remains his team-mate, Javier Mascherano (178, of which he won 144)

            Comment


              #7
              Nah not having it. If he's a ****house then every single traditional centre-forward is a ****house. It makes Shearer a ****house, Toshack a ****house...every one of them. He has balls pumped up to him for 90 minutes every week and there isn't a way of trying to head the ball without using arms for leverage. It's the nature of the beast. He's not dirty at all. Broken noses will happen, it's the way it is. I broke someone's nose in the Sunday leagues once, going for an aerial ball from a goal kick. I didn't mean it, it just happened.
              Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by ****house View Post
                Nah not having it. If he's a ****house then every single traditional centre-forward is a ****house. It makes Shearer a ****house, Toshack a ****house...every one of them. He has balls pumped up to him for 90 minutes every week and there isn't a way of trying to head the ball without using arms for leverage. It's the nature of the beast. He's not dirty at all. Broken noses will happen, it's the way it is. I broke someone's nose in the Sunday leagues once, going for an aerial ball from a goal kick. I didn't mean it, it just happened.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Thing is it's not just England who have apparently 'overlooked' him, but every big and biggish club in the Prem too, and if he has; as the article says..."long been recognised as one of the most effective targetmen in the Premier League" why have none of those clubs managers ever given him a chance ?

                  Is his style of play just seen as not compatible with playing good football, or is it that he's just not good enough ?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    We'll just have to agree to disagree on this then Shaggy.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                      Interesting.

                      Davies is not a dirty player and, as the article points out, is always the most-fouled player too (this only behind Pienaar)...he only gives as good as he gets and clearly it's an opposition ploy to get about Davies and get in his face, so to speak. He's not a ****house at all - can anyone give a single example of appalling dangerous play by Davies? I suspect not.

                      I knew we'd had no luck this season but that stat about hitting the woodwork takes the piss.
                      Yes, interesting article.

                      Davies is actually an extremely nice fella. Both his parents died within months of each other a couple of years ago - poor fella. I suspect Crouch gives away loads of fouls too, not because he's dirty but just because of his height.

                      ...and that stat about the woodwork just sums up our season.
                      'Religion is killing each other over who has the best imaginary friend'

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                        Nah not having it. If he's a ****house then every single traditional centre-forward is a ****house. It makes Shearer a ****house, Toshack a ****house...every one of them. He has balls pumped up to him for 90 minutes every week and there isn't a way of trying to head the ball without using arms for leverage. It's the nature of the beast. He's not dirty at all. Broken noses will happen, it's the way it is. I broke someone's nose in the Sunday leagues once, going for an aerial ball from a goal kick. I didn't mean it, it just happened.
                        I can see that - it certainly is a tradition that has been in the game but there is an argument that the same was true of tackling from behind before the rule change. The change was undoubtedly for the best and I have to say the way some players get away with using elbows is not good. In a way Davies reputation ensures that he is refereed in the way I would like to see the game refereed.
                        "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                        -- William Blake

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post


                          Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
                          Thing is it's not just England who have apparently 'overlooked' him, but every big and biggish club in the Prem too, and if he has; as the article says..."long been recognised as one of the most effective targetmen in the Premier League" why have none of those clubs managers ever given him a chance ?

                          Is his style of play just seen as not compatible with playing good football, or is it that he's just not good enough ?
                          Thing is this 'style of play' of his isn't natural to him at all. He was never that sort of player, Allardyce is the one who converted him into a burly target man. For years he was a skinny, pacey, tricky winger-cum-striker. Anyone remember his goal at Everton (for Southampton I think) when he dribbled from his own half past about 8 men before slotting it in?

                          Originally posted by Reece View Post
                          We'll just have to agree to disagree on this then Shaggy.


                          But the fact he's also the most fouled every year speaks volumes.
                          Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by elrichio86 View Post
                            Probably because we keep giving the ball away though.
                            In the article it says we were one of the teams with the most possession per match at 59.1% (i think), marginally behind Arsenal and Chelsea so that stat would suggest otherwise.
                            'Religion is killing each other over who has the best imaginary friend'

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                              Thing is this 'style of play' of his isn't natural to him at all. He was never that sort of player, Allardyce is the one who converted him into a burly target man. For years he was a skinny, pacey, tricky winger-cum-striker. Anyone remember his goal at Everton (for Southampton I think) when he dribbled from his own half past about 8 men before slotting it in?
                              Not sure about pacey. Perhaps at Chesterfield's level he wasn't particularly slow but the way he bombed at Blackburn shows he didn't have enough of something to play the same way.

                              It was a good goal.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X