Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

David Pleat appreciation thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Platt or Pleat?

    Comment


      #17
      Of all the 3 times cautioned Curb crawlers, he is my favourite.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by 5europeancups View Post
        lawrenson to start with.

        but I agree Platt is good even if it is just for a few great goals in the late eighties early nineties and a last minute super goal against belgium coutesy of a gazza pass.


        Pleat and Taylor are among my favourites too.

        Talking of Platt how the **** did he get a coaching role at City!? He talks absolute codswallop as a pundit.
        'Religion is killing each other over who has the best imaginary friend'

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
          Taylor's good too - the pair of 'em are about the most insightful around, somewhat unbelievably, although I think Pleat offers more tactical insight than Taylor.
          Yes, definitely. The thing I like about him too, is that he sometimes gives his opinion of players now (whom were youth players) from a somewhat scouting perspective. Like in quite a few games, he spoke about Benayoun and being familiar with him when he was still a junior player and saying that he was a striker somewhat in the Owen mould or something. Sometimes he seems a bit simplistic, although he does atleast say something which is somewhat beneficial to hear from. Which is a lot more than you can expect from a lot of other pundits, commentators and "experts".

          Comment


            #20
            I agree Pleat's good. I'm trying to recall who first called it...

            http://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/show...9676#post69676

            It's good you chaps have finally caught up.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment

            Working...
            X