El Clásico

[danperkins]

so what is more all round or complete than diego?

Could Diego tackle, good in the air (apart from hand ball ), play with both feet, amazing passing range? Zidane big and strong, yet fast and balanced. Complete as in the guy had no weaknesses in his game, he could do everything.

[Neil Young]

so what is more all round or complete than diego?

He certainly was all round.

[danperkins]

So explain to me what you mean by 'the best all round' or 'the most complete' then?

Or even just explain what you consider 'complete' to mean, in a footballer's sense.

Personally, i think Steven Gerrard is a more complete player than Zidane was.

Are you taking the ****ing piss?

[Chris]

They've gotta admit they're up against the best club side ever and accept it. They're a freak team, but Madrid dont seem to realise it and if he ****s up the home game and in the CL, he's had it.

What Pellegrini did in that league last season was absolutely mindblowing really but because it didnt equal success he got ****ed off.

[CJ]

Could Diego tackle, good in the air (apart from hand ball ), play with both feet, amazing passing range? Zidane big and strong, yet fast and balanced. Complete as in the guy had no weaknesses in his game, he could do everything.

i must admit i never saw him have a good game in goals though

a pretty glaring weakness if you want to be complete

[Craig_H]

Are you taking the ****ing piss?

Not in the slightest.

You're telling me Zidane was a powerful and fierce tackler?

Did he have dynamic or electric pace?

Did he put his foot in and clear people out?

I honestly dont think you have any understanding of what is meant in the conventional sense, by a 'complete' footballer.

[GraciousGooner]

Very droll. No doubt you weren't even born then, you WUM merchant.

I'm probably a little older than your dad kiddo. Just thought you were very gracious saying this bunch are better than your 88 side.

On the flip side, selling one of your best players to them and him not getting a sniff seems like a waste tbh Poulson.

[danperkins]

i must admit i never saw him have a good game in goals though

a pretty glaring weakness if you want to be complete

Thats not really funny Lt. Steve

[CJ]

Not in the slightest.

You're telling me Zidane was a powerful and fierce tackler?

Did he have dynamic or electric pace?

Did he put his foot in and clear people out?

I honestly dont think you have any understanding of what is meant in the conventional sense, by a 'complete' footballer.

gerrard has played right back

deep cm

cm

rm

lm

and support striker

so it is quite complete

but again not seen him in goals

[CJ]

Thats not really funny Lt. Steve

how old are you again?

[Imy]

Not in the slightest.

You're telling me Zidane was a powerful and fierce tackler?

Did he have dynamic or electric pace?

Did he put his foot in and clear people out?

I honestly dont think you have any understanding of what is meant in the conventional sense, by a 'complete' footballer.

Agree Maradona is number 1, BUT Zidane is/was better then Gerrard

[Craig_H]

Thats not really funny Lt. Steve

http://www.starzmovie.com/images/cac...age_312021.jpg

You've done this joke twice today and it's not been funny either time. Even for you.

[Craig_H]

Agree Maradona is number 1, BUT Zidane is/was better then Gerrard

Better, yes. Of course.

Not more complete, though.

As i said, i think danperkins uses terms he doesnt fully understand.

[Shaggy]

I'm probably a little older than your dad kiddo. Just thought you were very gracious saying this bunch are better than your 88 side.

On the flip side, selling one of your best players to them and him not getting a sniff seems like a waste tbh Poulson.

You're 87? Silver surfers FTW

[Craig_H]

You're 87? Silver surfers FTW