The ****ers. Do you know what they'd priced the draw up as? And more importantly - did you?
-
The ****ers.
Do you know what they'd priced the draw up as? And more importantly - did you?
-
It ended 3-3?!
Everyone loves a good match-fixing scandal
Comment
-
Price started as a standard 3.24 - 3.40. Some bookies pulled it and others dropped it to 1.44 but a few of them didn't clock on and left it as 3.40Originally posted by Craig_H View Post The ****ers.
Do you know what they'd priced the draw up as?
No commentOriginally posted by Craig_H View PostAnd more importantly - did you?
Comment
-
Price started as a standard 3.24 - 3.40
I got 3.15
Internet is a great place if you know what sites to visit.Stop the cyberhate
from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a 
Susan Black
Comment
-
Nordicbet?Originally posted by Arn View Post
I got 3.15
Internet is a great place if you know what sites to visit.
Comment
-
Stop the cyberhate
from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a
Susan BlackComment
-
Chievo-Sampdoria on sunday. Expected to be a draw....Comment
-
tbh it has draw written all over it even if there isn't any foul play behind the scenes.Originally posted by -V- View PostJürgen Klopp
Comment
-
Thanks for the tip!Nope, don't need anger management, you just need to stop pissing me off!Comment
-
The draw is 4/9 with PP
Comment
-
Oi oi!
4/9 FFS
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
You think the bookies might have got wind of this alleged dodginess?
Comment
-
Where did you just spring from, or did I miss your return earlier?Originally posted by Craig_H View PostThe draw is 4/9 with PP
I haven't seen a welcoming thread
Comment
-
I didnt go anywhere, to return
I found the whole haphazard inconsistent running of things boring, and i dont post when things bore me.Comment
-
Originally posted by Craig_H View PostYou think the bookies might have got wind of this alleged dogginess?
Nothing 'alleged' about it..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment