As I just read on Twitter, his economy with the truth/massaging of the facts is quite deliberate...i.e. 12th and not 16th (we were 16th when Dalglish was appointed). Laughable.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Roy Hodgson
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Shaggy View PostAs I just read on Twitter, his economy with the truth/massaging of the facts is quite deliberate...i.e. 12th and not 16th (we were 16th when Dalglish was appointed). Laughable.
We were 12th when he left http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...em/9331205.stm
Not that it makes any difference 12th is still unacceptableThe only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Neil Young View PostI don't hate him and I don't find his self justifications annoying. Rather I think they're laughable.
I'm sure you're right about his impact at West Brom but giving him credit there doesn't mean he isn't a f*ckwit (OK Fernandinho?
) when he talks complete b*ll*cks about his time at LFC.
.
96 Never Forgotten
Comment
-
Dullard.Originally posted by dww View PostWhilst I shared/share a lot of peoples doubts about his ability to manage us the constant attacks seem unwarranted. He'll save West Brom and given their form when he took over that will be a solid effort. He was woeful for us and his attitude was an awful fit but I still think he is a decent man and manager of less ambitious teams.Was muß, das muß.
Comment
-
I think we'll **** them up the arse good and proper. Then have a Smint.Originally posted by passandmove View PostI've a bad feeling about the game against West Brom after the international break. It's almost written in the stars that they'll play their game of the season.Was muß, das muß.
Comment
-
Shall I ban him or would you like to do the honours?.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-

I'll add him to the list.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment

Comment