Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Still my favourite collective of nouns goes to Rushiesbushymoustache for this gem. Appologies if repeated, it's that good.
Ambitionless, defeatist, inspid, oxygen thieving c*** of man. No, Roy you addled geriatric t***, I don't think you're a bad manager, I think you're utter s***, covered in a thick layer of vomit with a double decker poking out of the top. Bluffing, incompetent, incapable, snivelling, cowardly gob s****, blurt, and senile old spunker.
Still my favourite collective of nouns goes to Rushiesbushymoustache for this gem. Appologies if repeated, it's that good.
Ambitionless, defeatist, inspid, oxygen thieving c*** of man. No, Roy you addled geriatric t***, I don't think you're a bad manager, I think you're utter s***, covered in a thick layer of vomit with a double decker poking out of the top. Bluffing, incompetent, incapable, snivelling, cowardly gob s****, blurt, and senile old spunker.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment