Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Martin Lipton v Chelsea TV presenter

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
    #16
    She knows that. She's very clearly implying he made it all up and she's calling him out on it.

    At least it's a change from that nice young couple on LFCTV who wouldn't say boo to a goose.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment

      #17
      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      She knows that. She's very clearly implying he made it all up and she's calling him out on it.

      At least it's a change from that nice young couple on LFCTV who wouldn't say boo to a goose.


      Refreshing attitude and approach from her I thought.
      "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

      Comment

        #18
        Originally posted by Tee View Post


        Refreshing attitude and approach from her I thought.
        Agreed, ****ing press make up all sorts of bull****, nice to see them get pulled up for once. Cunts.
        RAFA

        Comment

          #19
          I just meant to imply she's a munter.
          Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

          Comment

            #20
            he may have made it up.

            however if he didnt he is not going to tell her.

            so a bit of a non event really

            Comment

              #21
              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              She knows that. She's very clearly implying he made it all up and she's calling him out on it.

              At least it's a change from that nice young couple on LFCTV who wouldn't say boo to a goose.
              I wouldn't say boo to a goose either. I said shoooh to a swan yesterday and me and my dog had to run for our lives. Them ****ing things can fairly move.
              If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?

              Comment

                #22
                Originally posted by Marsh View Post
                he may have made it up.

                however if he didnt he is not going to tell her.

                so a bit of a non event really
                He made it up.

                Papers are toiling for circulation and journalists will say anything for sales.
                I guess that is the point she is trying to make. If he had a source hw would have named them. All the papers do it, as the amount of bull**** you haave to trawl through on the Transfer Rumours section of this site illustrates.
                Modifying post.

                Comment

                  #23
                  i dont see it the same. i dont think they do name sources like you say.

                  i cant disagree that they make lots up though.

                  Comment

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Buzzo View Post
                    He made it up.

                    Papers are toiling for circulation and journalists will say anything for sales.
                    I guess that is the point she is trying to make. If he had a source hw would have named them. All the papers do it, as the amount of bull**** you haave to trawl through on the Transfer Rumours section of this site illustrates.
                    Disagree.

                    Comment

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Buzzo View Post
                      He made it up.

                      Papers are toiling for circulation and journalists will say anything for sales.
                      I guess that is the point she is trying to make. If he had a source hw would have named them. All the papers do it, as the amount of bull**** you haave to trawl through on the Transfer Rumours section of this site illustrates.
                      A journo who names their source will no longer have any sources.

                      Comment

                        #26
                        Very similar to this

                        [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Bq_dkPkQUU"]YouTube - The Day Today - Peter O'Hanra-Hanrahan[/ame]

                        Comment

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                          A journo who names their source will no longer have any sources.
                          And that is the crux of the issue.

                          Journalists can print any old ****e they want citing 'sources' knowing that if asked to reveal them they can refuse on the grounds of 'journalistic integrity'

                          integrity indeed.

                          Comment

                            #28
                            Thing is, the presenter is probably a journalist too, so she was just being a clever dic really, nothing to do with Journalistic morality with her, and more likely she's upset at him for daring to doubt the unity in the Chelsea camp so thought she'd try and show him up, but tbf, as someone already stated, they both come out of it badly imo.

                            And future guests might think twice about talking to her, which won't really help Chav tv.

                            Not that i'm one to defend journalists, quite the opposite really, but the whole thing just seemed a bit of a farce to me, coming as it did from a Chav tv presenter, i mean...hey...they are always honest and above board with their stories and rumours.
                            Last edited by Vermilion; 17-04-11, 11:54 AM.

                            Comment

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
                              A journo who names their source will no longer have any sources.
                              I suppose that is true.

                              But the fact of the matter is a journalist can make up any old ****e, because they do not have to name a source. 'A source close to the team' etc etc all it is is an excuse to invent a story to create a headline to sell a paper, and they do it every day off the week.
                              Modifying post.

                              Comment

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Buzzo View Post
                                I suppose that is true.

                                But the fact of the matter is a journalist can make up any old ****e, because they do not have to name a source. 'A source close to the team' etc etc all it is is an excuse to invent a story to create a headline to sell a paper, and they do it every day off the week.
                                Aye of course, but that's the nature of the beast. Catch-22 really. Obviously they can make up ****e and 'protect' their 'source' when there may perhaps not be one.

                                Likewise though, if they have a genuine source, obviously they cant be revealing it.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                                Working...
                                X