Manchester City

[Norbs]

[SB]

[baitman]

[SB]

[Norbs]

The length of that woman's finger

[RedReet]

Starting to think they will get hit with a points deduction this year, meaning the only impact is missing CL football for a year. The PL will claim it as a win and City most certainly will, despite what they say publically.

They'll then go on a massive spending spree this summer and maybe win another 4 consecutive titles.

[Buzzo]

Pep is defo not handling this well. Feels like he is simmering into some sort of wild Patrick Bateman esque rage.

[ame]https://twitter.com/thekophq/status/1865042190830911722[/ame]

[ame]https://twitter.com/bludablue/status/1865509148680425955[/ame]

[RedReet]

[SB]

He seems to think EVERYONE should worship the ground on which he walks. Poor deluded *******

[EwarWoo]

What did he say before just because you lost? Because unless it was "I'm glad you mums dead and I'm ****ing your daughter just because you lost" then thats not in any way in perspective.

And this was back in May before it all fell apart. Apparently taken after city united cup final.

[Doc_Piptorious]

Yep was from after last season's cup final.

[Exiled_red]

I'm not getting all the outrage from some about Lewis' sending off, I've seen alot of people saying it wasn't a foul and some City fans saying it should have been a penalty for the foul on him

Am I missing something, the Palace player has the ball and clears it, Lewis lunges in after the ball is gone and gets caught on the follow through. It's not a foul on Lewis and while he does get caught that's as a result of his own poor late challenge. I can see why some might think it's a little harsh to give him a yellow, but it is a poor challenge that was never getting the ball, and after mouthing off at the ref a few minutes before (and earlier in the game) you can see why the ref might not be keen to give the benefit of any doubt. Maybe that's what Guardiola meant when he said it's because it's Lewis

[Mr Pink]

I'm not getting all the outrage from some about Lewis' sending off, I've seen alot of people saying it wasn't a foul and some City fans saying it should have been a penalty for the foul on him

Am I missing something, the Palace player has the ball and clears it, Lewis lunges in after the ball is gone and gets caught on the follow through. It's not a foul on Lewis and while he does get caught that's as a result of his own poor late challenge. I can see why some might think it's a little harsh to give him a yellow, but it is a poor challenge that was never getting the ball, and after mouthing off at the ref a few minutes before (and earlier in the game) you can see why the ref might not be keen to give the benefit of any doubt. Maybe that's what Guardiola meant when he said it's because it's Lewis

They were making out that it’s the reason they didn’t win too- he was sent off on the 85th minute ffs, and they were second best for most the game.

[baitman]

Have 115 become 130

[Cerbie]

Have 115 become 130

I've seen a few things on X, but nothing from reputable sources as yet. For the charge count to increase at this late stage, I suspect the panel has indicated that it would like to see some of the 115 separated to allow them to judge more easily. They could be guilty of one aspect but not the other until the judgement is released though we are all just guessing.