pub landlady vs sky

[dom9]

It'll be the same for all clubs though.

Does that mean we'll only be able to pay our best players £50k per week rather than £100k per week?

[Arn]It will make us even less competitive against the European clubs, particularly the Spanish. Don't foget our 50% tax rate too. It's already having an effect, if you forget about City.[/Arn]

[Kenneth]

[Arn]It will make us even less competitive against the European clubs, particularly the Spanish. Don't foget our 50% tax rate too. It's already having an effect, if you forget about City.[/Arn]

All true, but meh. So winning in Europe will be harder. It might be more of an issue if we hadn't already won it 5 times

[dom9]

Anyway, I didn't voice an opinion on whether it was good or bad. Just pointed out that you ommitted from your analysis.

[Kenneth]

Analysis? I know you're not talking to me now.

[Lee]

**** the European clubs.

We have wealthy owners and I doubt the FFP rules will be implemented that well.

I forgot to add those in my analysis too.

[dom9]

Analysis? I know you're not talking to me now.

No I was talking to Lee.

[Neil Young]

Where does all the money go, in Sky's pockets? If the council is taking money from it, then this is fair enough.

Of course Sky take the cash and they exploit their market domination whatever the sector.

I simply disagree with your suggestion that it's unfair to treat pubs differently from private individuals.

[Alex]

Of course Sky take the cash and they exploit their market domination whatever the sector.

I simply disagree with your suggestion that it's unfair to treat pubs differently from private individuals.

[Neil Young]

British lichens

[Alex]

Helicopters

[Arn]

**** the European clubs.

We have wealthy owners and I doubt the FFP rules will be implemented that well.

I forgot to add those in my analysis too.

Money from TV deals shouldn't even count in the accounts when UEFA look at them IMO.

They should just add a fixed amount, say €30m, to every account instead of the TV money. The reason being that it is different rules. Some countries like Spain and Italy have individual TV deals and the PL don't. Then you add another fixed amount if the club play in the CL/EL.

It isn't fair that the English clubs get paid more only because they are English IMO. An English team that qualify for the last 16 get paid much more than a Croatian team for example.

In reality they will get paid more but UEFA should replace those figures with a fixed amount instead.

[Alex]

Its also not fair that 3 or 4 leagues prop up the money for the rest of the competition. But they do. Nothing is perfect Arn.

[dom9]

Money from TV deals shouldn't even count in the accounts when UEFA look at them IMO.

They should just add a fixed amount, say €30m, to every account instead of the TV money. The reason being that it is different rules. Some countries like Spain and Italy have individual TV deals and the PL don't. Then you add another fixed amount if the club play in the CL/EL.

It isn't fair that the English clubs get paid more only because they are English IMO. An English team that qualify for the last 16 get paid much more than a Croatian team for example.

In reality they will get paid more but UEFA should replace those figures with a fixed amount instead.

In that case gate receipts shouldn't be counted either. It's simply not fair that some clubs have bigger stadiums than others. Particularly where local rules mean that the some clubs can't just infinitely expand their capacity at the expense of local residents and the community.

[Arn]

Its also not fair that 3 or 4 leagues prop up the money for the rest of the competition. But they do. Nothing is perfect Arn.

I know but UEFA can do something about it very easily. The clubs would still get their money but it would count in a different and more fair way if UEFA did what I suggested.

If a club qualify for the last 16 then they add €15m to the accounts. €25m if they qualify for the last eight and €40 if they qualify for the last four and so on.

That would be fair when UEFA look at the accounts.

[dom9]

I know but UEFA can do something about it very easily. The clubs would still get their money but it would count in a different and more fair way if UEFA did what I suggested.

If a club qualify for the last 16 then they add €15m to the accounts. €25m if they qualify for the last eight and €40 if they qualify for the last four and so on.

That would be fair when UEFA look at the accounts.

It would only be fair if that was their actual income.