Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pub landlady vs sky

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 7
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 template Next
    #61
    Originally posted by ChesterDave View Post
    And it will appease those who cant afford to spend £40 on a ticket before any transport costs. And clubs will have to learn to cope with less money.

    Are you a deranged sea lion if you sit in the pub watching the game on Sky Sports, or is it just because its 3pm on a Saturday?
    thats if they have a club left...

    Comment

      #62
      Originally posted by ChesterDave View Post
      And it will appease those who cant afford to spend £40 on a ticket before any transport costs. And clubs will have to learn to cope with less money.

      Are you a deranged sea lion if you sit in the pub watching the game on Sky Sports, or is it just because its 3pm on a Saturday?
      Do you not see the irony in bemoaning current ticket prices, yet backing something which will see them rise further?

      And those pub folk are obviously quite welcome to enjoy the game down the pub. For as long as their club stays in business, that is.

      Comment

        #63
        Originally posted by Craig_H View Post
        Do you not see the irony in bemoaning current ticket prices, yet backing something which will see them rise further?

        And those pub folk are obviously quite welcome to enjoy the game down the pub. For as long as their club stays in business, that is.
        With 54,000 posts you dont seem like you'll back down so I'll conceed by saying I'm ****ing gutted. I wish Sky won. I hopew more people who cant afford a ticket are also told to go ****ing whistle if they want to watch their team in the pub.

        Of course, there is always the point I made about how clubs will have to adapt and perhaps realise that charging £300 a ticket to make up for the money they wont get from Sky isnt going to fly and maybe they will stop paying ****ty carthorse journeymen £40,000 a week. Perhaps we'll get a few less mercenaries and a few more people that play for the game
        Football without Origi is nothing

        Comment

          #64
          its not about liking sky, high prices but the fact is their a clubs supply line for cash, and clubs will have planned that money into their future and Everton have even sold their next 2 years worth of payments.

          If this was announced now and brought in in 5 years clubs may survive, but this is likely to be more cut throat.

          Comment

            #65
            The old '54000 posts' chestnut

            Christ on a bike.

            Comment

              #66
              Originally posted by ChesterDave View Post
              With 54,000 posts you dont seem like you'll back down so I'll conceed by saying I'm ****ing gutted. I wish Sky won. I hopew more people who cant afford a ticket are also told to go ****ing whistle if they want to watch their team in the pub.

              Of course, there is always the point I made about how clubs will have to adapt and perhaps realise that charging £300 a ticket to make up for the money they wont get from Sky isnt going to fly and maybe they will stop paying ****ty carthorse journeymen £40,000 a week. Perhaps we'll get a few less mercenaries and a few more people that play for the game
              This case has been going on for six years. Any club that finds itself in difficulty because they haven't planned for the possibility of this verdict is, by definition, badly run.

              But it won't matter because Sky and the FA will find a way around it.

              I suppose we can expect lots of scaremongering from them though. It just surprises me a few fans seem to have beaten them to it.
              .
              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



              May the Lord bless this post.

              Comment

                #67
                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                This case has been going on for six years. Any club that finds itself in difficulty because they haven't planned for the possibility of this verdict is, by definition, badly run.

                But it won't matter because Sky and the FA will find a way around it.

                I suppose we can expect lots of scaremongering from them though. It just surprises me a few fans seem to have beaten them to it.
                second line makes the first invalid, even you think it wont happen so why will the clubs apart, from city and chelsea who have bags of cash from elsewhere that money is being spent

                Comment

                  #68
                  No it doesn't.
                  .
                  Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                  May the Lord bless this post.

                  Comment

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                    No it doesn't.
                    how doesnt it?

                    Comment

                      #70
                      Because it doesn't.

                      Although I really don't understand the rest of your post. So could you rephrase please?
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                        Because it doesn't.

                        Although I really don't understand the rest of your post. So could you rephrase please?
                        you say the clubs have known about this for 6 years so they be able to adapt, however you agreed that the law is never going to change so why would the clubs think its going to change theyve kept on spending the money. Everyone will be buggered except City/Chelsea. If this is going to happen it needs to be announced offically and phased in, unless we are going to see a footballing bail out

                        Comment

                          #72
                          I see. It seems to me that the non sequitur is in your argument, not mine.

                          I think any club that hasn't made contingency planning for this is badly run.

                          However the fact it won't change anything means it won't change anything, not that Man City and Chelsea will be all right while everyone else is f*cked. (There's your non sequitur.)

                          And if you think it needs this for Man City and Chelsea to have a massive unfair advantage then I think you're mistaken. They have that advantage whatever happens about rights.

                          I think your fears are groundless.

                          As will be Everton, with any luck.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment

                            #73
                            then I think every single club in the premier league is badly run in your book, however city and chelsea have the power to be least affected.

                            Comment

                              #74
                              If they're badly run then the executives are responsible for the mess they're in, not this ruling...

                              I'm orff to my basket.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment

                                #75
                                if every business planned for an event which is 99% of the time not going to happen, business would never be done

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 template Next
                                Working...
                                X