Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Manchester United

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ed Woodward will continue to call the shots on the transfer policy at Manchester United, with the club not expected to appoint a sporting or technical director this summer.

    The club have pursued a structural shake-up centred on finding someone who will oversee signings, but executive vice-chairman Woodward has yet to identify a preferred candidate and is pressing ahead with transfers himself.

    Talks have been held with Rio Ferdinand, Darren Fletcher and Patrice Evra over offering assistance and opinions on players, but talk has shifted from suggestions of a committee-style approach involving multiple former players.

    United have been prepared to allow any chosen candidate to be based in the club’s Mayfair offices in London.

    The £18million deal to take Daniel James to Old Trafford from Swansea was negotiated by Matt Judge, United’s head of corporate affairs, with Woodward signing off on terms. The duo have overseen recruitment for the past few windows.

    Manager Ole Gunnar Solskjaer and assistant Mike Phelan take an active part in deciding transfer targets, with chief scouts Jim Lawlor and Mick Court also contributing.

    Lawlor and Court, who use a team of analysts, served Sir Alex Ferguson’s recruitment team. John Murtagh, youth development chief, and Marcel Bout, head of global scouting, are also influential.

    Either Solskjaer and Phelan or the club, led by Woodward, can veto any signing.

    United feel the system works and while Woodward has spoken to several people about becoming sporting or technical director, discussions are yet to progress to a meaningful stage.

    Harry Maguire and Aaron Wan-Bissaka are prime transfer targets this summer, fitting the request from Solskjaer and Phelan for young British players, but United are currently unwilling to meet the defenders’ valuations.

    A price of £90m has been mentioned for Maguire, who Phelan worked with at Hull. Palace want £60m for Wan-Bissaka.

    Ferdinand remains open to working for the club in some capacity. He said on Tuesday night: ‘It all depends on the shape of the job. I don’t think it’s all been outlined at United in terms of — that’s the job and this is the description.

    ‘There’s a lot to talk about within that. To be fair to United, in that kind of role, the responsibility that comes with that, you can’t lie and say that’s not a turn on.

    ‘You are helping to shape the fortunes of a club of that stature. That’s a huge job.’

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...er-policy.html

    Comment


      Excellent news
      Oh I don't know.

      Comment


        Originally posted by dom9 View Post
        Excellent news


        Its beautiful watching them deconstruct.
        One tit for another.

        Comment


          Not you Phoenix but what a ****e piece of a story, since when would Phelan undermine the manager - What a pile of ****e.

          I know **** all on transfers, but just the infrastructure, and there is no way Utd are going to spend big time without a recoup along the line. FWIW they know they have been burnt big with Pogba/Sanchez and they cannot afford a repeat, as the Glazers want/demand an annual return and also the shareholders.

          Old Trafford has deteriorated beyond recognition over the last few years and they need to/are doing something about it, but it may not be enough.

          The property they own around Trafford Park is up for sale, now the tram lines are coming into effect..
          I make no apologies, this is me

          Comment


            Made a few subtle adjustments & sent this to some Scum mates.
            3rd place. Worst champions ever.

            Comment


              How has Old Trafford deteriorated? Isn't it a modern stadium?
              Was muß, das muß.

              Comment


                Originally posted by foresterbloke View Post
                How has Old Trafford deteriorated? Isn't it a modern stadium?
                Nothing has really been done to it for a number of years,i had a quick look on redcafe a few months back some where saying it is turning into a dump in fact they said the club was penny pinching over the stadium.

                Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
                who's arsed?

                Comment


                  [ame]https://twitter.com/skysportspl/status/1139194890531868672[/ame]

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by shanks69 View Post
                    Nothing has really been done to it for a number of years,i had a quick look on redcafe a few months back some where saying it is turning into a dump in fact they said the club was penny pinching over the stadium.

                    Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
                    They've been complaining about leaky roofing and ****ed (old?) toilets for years I think
                    Like blood on iron

                    Comment


                      There was that massive roof leak earlier in the year.
                      Oh I don't know.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                        They've been complaining about leaky roofing and ****ed (old?) toilets for years I think
                        [emoji106]

                        Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
                        who's arsed?

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                          They've been complaining about leaky roofing and ****ed (old?) toilets for years I think
                          Pretty sure Woodward paid £100 k for a plastic bucket

                          Comment


                            I imagine their corporate facilities are looking quite tired and outdated when compared to the likes of our main stand or White Heart Lane too.
                            Oh I don't know.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by foresterbloke View Post
                              How has Old Trafford deteriorated? Isn't it a modern stadium?

                              You reminded me of this article from 18 months ago (I may have posted it at the time); I doubt OT has improved in the meantime:



                              On Sunday the eyes of the world will be focussed on Manchester. As the cross-town rivals go head to head at the top of the Premier League, in a match that will have a huge bearing on the direction of the title, updates from the match will spin round the globe. Or at least they would if the WiFi in the Old Trafford press box actually worked.

                              Everywhere reporters go in the Premier League these days, at the Emirates and the Etihad, at Anfield and the Amex, the WiFi works like a dream. Except at the Theatre of Dreams. There it drifts in and out, stops unexpectedly, disappears entirely from view, making the delivery of reports - so straight-forward elsewhere - a source of constant frustration. And it has been like that for the past five years at least.

                              This may seem the most niche of complaints. Really, what does it matter that a few journalists are inconvenienced when the product on the pitch is as compelling as this? Except the shabby state of communications at the country’s largest club venue is indicative of a wider issue: this is a sporting institution in urgent need of investment. Frankly, it would not take much in the way of cash to sort out the problem. But at United for the past decade, when it comes to funding improvements, there has been an institutionalised reluctance for hands to go anywhere near pockets.

                              And that is a story that can be seen all round the stadium. When the Manchester City fans file into their rivals’ home on Sunday it will be a familiar trip. While the Etihad is a place subject to almost constant upgrade and redevelopment, Old Trafford has not changed at all in more than 10 years. Nothing has been added, nothing rebuilt, nothing improved. The capacity has not been increased, the facilities have not been overhauled, even the pies remain as inedible as they have long been.

                              Once Old Trafford was the leader of stadium development, the shining light of modernism. After the Taylor Report demanded football be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern world, the Manchester United board quicker than anyone else appreciated the commercial returns that could come from developing their infrastructure.

                              Blessed with the room to expand, they built upwards and outwards. It wasn’t cheap, but soon they had the grandest stadium in the country, capable of accommodating more of the club’s vast supporter base than ever before. By the time the quadrants were extended in 2005 to take the capacity up to over 75,000, United were so far ahead they could entertain 30,000 more paying customers than any of their main rivals.

                              In the past decade, however, as Old Trafford has remained pickled in aspic, so the rest have been playing catch up. Arsenal have moved into the Emirates, Spurs will move into the state-of-the-art new White Hart Lane next season, Chelsea have plans for a super stadium at Stamford Bridge. Meanwhile, Liverpool and Manchester City have hugely increased their capacity with grand new stands, West Ham can now play to 20,000 more people since they purloined the London Stadium, even Crystal Palace are in the process of a sizeable expansion. Everywhere corporate revenues are increasing from adventurous new facilities like City’s Tunnel Club. Meanwhile, United’s premium offer remains as it has for the past 10 years: steak, chips and a pre-match live appearance by Clayton Blackmore.

                              The lack of investment is indicative. At Old Trafford, under the Glazer ownership, everything is focussed on the present not the future. All initiatives are concentrated on upping the revenues from global corporate partnerships in order to pare down the debt. These are not owners interested in investing. After all, they have not put a penny of their own money into the club, preferring to use others’ cash to pay off the cost of buying the place. Blessed with taking on a property that was then the market leader, they have sat back and done nothing to keep it ahead of the game.



                              Everywhere you look at United it is the same. Once the training ground was the best around. Now it has been overtaken by those at Arsenal, Spurs and Everton, never mind the magnificent facility that has bloomed across town at the Etihad. Likewise, the Academy that once produced the Class of '92 is now lingering in the shadow of City and Chelsea. While the rest of the game has invested to improve, at United the roof has remained unrepaired as the sun has shone.

                              There are those working within the club who are more than aware of the need to upgrade in order to recover the lost distance from the pack. Recently there has been talk of looking into expansion of the Sir Bobby Charlton stand, to take capacity up to 88,000. The trouble is, with a railway line running behind, this would be a hugely complicated, expensive project. And with owners who have proven reluctant ever to do anything other than extract money from the coffers, the cost of funding it has thus far kept the idea on the drawing board. One day, of couse, there might be news of development on that front. Though possibly not if we are dependent on the Old Trafford WiFi system to deliver it.

                              Comment


                                Meanwhile, United’s premium offer remains as it has for the past 10 years: steak, chips and a pre-match live appearance by Clayton Blackmore.

                                Oh I don't know.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X