Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Harry Redknapp trial

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Lecter View Post
    Indeed - however this is probably one of his best "defences" so far

    The others such as "it wasnt my account it was the dogs", "I cant spell my own name" etc... were absolute classics
    The more I hear, the more I am sure Jamie Redknapp QC is defending him.
    Modifying post.

    Comment


      SamWallaceIndy Sam Wallace
      Prosecution suggest Redknapp played for AC Milan. HR: 'Unfortunately not. I think I could manage them now Mourinho has gone"
      Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

      Comment


        Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
        His constant wise cracking is insanely bold. He just loves an audience 'Arry.
        Modifying post.

        Comment


          Wisecrack or just thick? Or even hamming up the old "I'm fick, me" act? Genuinely can't tell.
          Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

          Comment




            Embarrassing.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
              Wisecrack or just thick? Or even hamming up the old "I'm fick, me" act? Genuinely can't tell.
              It is hard to tell. It really is If this is all an act to characterise him as a total moron is a success due to him being a total moron.

              I'd have thought his Lawyer (Jamie) should be telling him to answer the questions in using few words as possible.
              ...tho' maybe that hampers the 'moron' defence

              ...Its like something from a sketch show.
              Modifying post.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                Wisecrack or just thick? Or even hamming up the old "I'm fick, me" act? Genuinely can't tell.
                The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Lecter View Post
                  Indeed - however this is probably one of his best "defences" so far

                  The others such as "it wasnt my account it was the dogs", "I cant spell my own name" etc... were absolute classics

                  He's definately trying to get the jury to empathise with him on the paying of taxes, no doubt, as did Mandaric.

                  Unfortunatley, the jury will be informed that the verdict should be based on legality, and not any perception that we pay too much taxes here, or that 'Ole Arry' has paid his dues.

                  Comment


                    SamWallaceIndy Sam Wallace
                    Redknapp took his mobile phone out his pocket in court to show jury. It's a Nokia, about ten years old
                    Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                    Comment


                      haha. Oh dear me, Harry has a ten year old Nokia, he must be innocent.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
                        haha. Oh dear me, Harry has a ten year old Nokia, he must be innocent.
                        "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
                          He's definately trying to get the jury to empathise with him on the paying of taxes, no doubt, as did Mandaric.

                          Unfortunatley, the jury will be informed that the verdict should be based on legality, and not any perception that we pay too much taxes here, or that 'Ole Arry' has paid his dues.

                          Exactly his defence is irrelevant. Being a thick **** is his problem, not HMRC's. And the big flaw in his defence, admitting he employs a highly paid firm of London Accountants.
                          Modifying post.

                          Comment


                            I didnt think Ignorance was a valid excuse in a court of law?
                            *Except Michael, who died.

                            Comment


                              The frequently tense exchanges between Redknapp and Black were lightened when Redknapp referred to his affection for his late bulldog Rosie, explaining that he had named his Monaco account after her because "I loved her to bits". He said that he had to add his birth date to the name as there was another Monaco HSBC account called Rosie.

                              When the prosecutor suggested that someone else might have had a dog by the same name, Redknapp shot back: "Please, Mr Black, it could be someone's wife," adding: "If she was as nice as Rosie they have got a good wife."
                              That rug really tied the room together.

                              Comment


                                BBC Sport's James Pearce on Twitter: "Redknapp: "I might tell Mr Beasley (NOTW) lies but I don't tell this Court lies. I'm the most ungreedy person you ever met - ever, ever. Give me bible back and I'll put my hand back on it."

                                BBC Sport's James Pearce on Twitter: "Prosecution: I suggest you're telling pack of lies Mr Redknapp. You've come to this Court and twisted your account to get you off hook." Redknapp: "You think that I put my hand on the bible and told lies? That's an insult. I've told you no lies.... I don't do that."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X