Chelsea

[dww]

Don't believe that for one moment, today was pure anger, burning deep inside, he barely contained it, nothing calculated at all, just a burning desire to tell everyone about how hard done by he is, and how unfair it all is when he loses.

I genuinely think he only changes his inflection with the anger - he says the same **** every time they have a bad loss. It seems pretty much like a mantra to me. Almost pre-rehearsed words.

If someone had said write a post match statement for Mourinho in the event of a 2-1 loss yesterday I bet everyone would have come up with something that looked pretty much identical to the quotes.

[Leyton388]

Mourinho on the loan system:

"It's phenomenal you have a player that, even when he is not playing for you, is scoring against your opponents," crowed Mourinho last month.


Too ****ing right Jose.

I'm nicking that mate

[Liverpel]

I'm nicking that mate

Go ahead. Spread the word.

[RedAndWhite]

Mourinho on the loan system:

"It's phenomenal you have a player that, even when he is not playing for you, is scoring against your opponents," crowed Mourinho last month.


Too ****ing right Jose.

I'm nicking that mate

Nicked for facebook as Leyton got there before me

[BubbaZanetti]

Mourinho on the loan system:

"It's phenomenal you have a player that, even when he is not playing for you, is scoring against your opponents," crowed Mourinho last month.


Too ****ing right Jose.

Two players Jose; Oussama & Fabio

[jono]

This article sums him up pretty well:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/jose-mourinho-loses-head-rui-3434113

An embarrassing way to bow out of the title race was worsened by the conduct of Jose Mourinho and his staff, who only wanted to play the blame game

Jamie McDonald
Embarrassing: Mourinho is forced to restrain Faria
This is how it normally pans out in Jose Mourinho’s world – aggro, recriminations, *nastiness, malice and** victimisation.

Often, there’s triumph at the end of it all, sometimes failure.

And as he dragged away one of his trusted lieutenants by his hair, even Mourinho will know which way this Premier League season is now going.

This may have been the day Mourinho’s bluff about the *deficiencies of his squad was called.

He probably had it spot on after all – not good enough for the title, a work not so much in progress as only just begun.

With three pretty hopeless strikers, by the way. His intimation, not mine.

But this was also the day when the refereeing industry *administered their own justice to Jose.

Disgracefully, his loyalists could not take it. Has there been a more unedifying sight than Mourinho having to resort to the most basic methods to contain Rui Faria? Not since Jose – still smarting from his recent FA fine no doubt – poked a rival coach in the eye over in Spain.

Throw in the Ramires forearm smash and you have an *ignominious and probably *decisive setback to Chelsea’s title hopes.

Too often, Mourinho’s teams have taken their slavish devotion to the image of their manager too far. His backroom staff certainly do. Faria should count himself lucky if he remains in a job this morning.

Had he not been restrained by Mourinho, there is no telling what he would have done. He had lost the plot.

Chelsea should not be aggrieved with Mike Dean’s performance. The decisive penalty WAS a penalty. And, of course, Dean overlooked the Ramires offence. Ramires has form. Bizarrely, Mourinho tried to shovel responsibility for Ramires’ *gruesome offence against Karim El Ahmadi on to Chris Foy.

Presumably, even he cannot saddle Dean with blame for the premeditated blow to the side of Seb Larsson’s head. The only blame Dean should shoulder is not spotting the offence.

The Football Association will rectify that oversight and Ramires can pack away his Premier League boots.

But Dean should not be *castigated. This was yet another game pockmarked by spurious appeals, *play-acting and snide fouls. And widespread dissent.

A brush-past makes the same players fall over who are grappling like prop forwards ahead of a corner.

Referees’ senses are being scrambled by the relentless con-artistry . If a team is wronged, then tough – because there is not a blameless side out there. If Chelsea feel they have been wronged, then tough. They are one of the least *blameless. The *inevitable loss of Ramires will give Mourinho another wagon for his circle. The siege mentality will surface.

Everything is against them. The enthusiastic, amateur judges in their Wembley offices, the fixture schedule generated by their own progress and, of course, the *limitations of his strikers.

Now, the odds are stacked against them.

Mourinho will go to Anfield with the chance to do Manuel Pellegrini a favour but with an unlikely title only a vague possibility, although that assumes Liverpool take care of business at Carrow Road today.

That is not guaranteed. What is guaranteed is that it always turns out this way with Jose. There’s always aggro, always malice, always someone to blame – and then he either wins or loses.

He’s losing this one.

[EwarWoo]

Lol. Press slowly but surely turning against him.

It doesn't take much for a snowball, he strikes back and they'll club together and go after him.

The press are cunts but in this instance their cuntishness can take down a bigger cunt a peg or 2 so I'm all for 'em

[Vermilion]

I genuinely think he only changes his inflection with the anger - he says the same **** every time they have a bad loss. It seems pretty much like a mantra to me. Almost pre-rehearsed words.

If someone had said write a post match statement for Mourinho in the event of a 2-1 loss yesterday I bet everyone would have come up with something that looked pretty much identical to the quotes.

I think people over analyse what he says far too much, blokes just a spolit brat who's upset when his team lose.

[tsb]

Really hope we hammer them next week in an Arsenal-esque fashion.

[greenbloodred]

There can't be a bigger cunt than Mourinho in all of world sport. There's a few knackers in US sports, can't just think of their names but i hear them talked about on a sports radio show without really taking in what they're on about.
Warren Gatland is an odious prick but he's not on terms with cuntchops Jose.

[Sarb]

I think people over analyse what he says far too much, blokes just a spolit brat who's upset when his team lose.

If he left it at that fair enough. But he doesnt. He basically forced Anders Frisk to retire, gouged a fellows eye to name a couple other things. I believe UEFA labelled him poison after what happened with Frisk.

His players and coaching team bring the game into totsl disrepute. Its not even gamesmanship. Drogba swearing into the camera too.

Press in Italy and Spain loathe him. For some reason press here lap it up

[RichC]

Too much is made of Mourinho's "mind games" for me he's an emotive man and I think this is what we see when he comes out with his usual diatribe after a game where he feels aggrieved.

A press peddle he's a mind game expert but for me I just don't buy it, he's a spoilt, petulant egomaniac that chooses what he sees to suit his own best interests which obviously others do but nowhere near to the levels of him.

I fancy he's under massive pressure from the hierarchy at Stamford Bridge and he's not coping with the pressure well.

[Roanmore]

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP301iR6tDQ&noredirect=1"]Jose Mourinho Has Hilarious Pop At Brendan Rodgers & Liverpool - 'Crying Managers' - YouTube[/ame]

Who's laughing now?

[badpiggy]

I have no time for this Mourinho mindgames bollox or the whole he-takes-pressure-off-his-players nonsense either. He's a negative, manipulative, cheating, petulant blight on football. There's nothing of value for anyone to learn from him or emulate. He's just there. Historically succesful. Visible. Loud. Publicly self-obsessed.

Just because we all either demand or genuinely enjoy sport having characters dosn't mean that his over-reported bull**** is in any way intelligent or witty or insightful - it's just the lack of interesting media-friendly characters at the top end of football makes space for him to appear interesting. He is definitely a brilliant manager but his character and personality is repulsive.

Just like Ronaldo is a brilliant player but clearly a repulsive individual. Why don't we laud Ronaldo as one of the great "characters" in football? Certainly he adds a lot of talking points to football but that's just the first level of analysis. His character is clearly revealed through his actions just like Mourinho's and just because it's stuff that's worth commenting on doesn't make either of them in any way great or laudable or an example to anyone about how to compete or win or lose.

[EwarWoo]

Just like Ronaldo is a brilliant player but clearly a repulsive individual.

Even Ronaldo does have some redeeming qualities.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/showbiz/465461/Hidden-side-of-a-superstar-Cristiano-Ronaldo-pays-for-boy-s-life-saving-treatment

Mourinho is all on his own.