Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Goal-line technology systems given green light

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    I'm nearer 40 than 30 too.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by CJ View Post
      I read that, thought **** he is getting on, then realised I am nearer 40 than 30. Oops


      Old Father Time waits for nobody.

      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      I'm nearer 140 than 30 too.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
        I'm nearer 40 than 30 too.
        In dog years

        Comment


          #34
          reverse dog years maybe.
          dave of mutilation

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
            I'm nearer 40 than 30 too.
            Not surprising.
            Are we winning?

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by NigelLG View Post
              Not surprising.
              is 55 nearer to 30 than 40 now? is math changing?
              dave of mutilation

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by little dave hedgehog View Post
                is 55 nearer to 30 than 40 now? is math changing?
                55?
                Are we winning?

                Comment


                  #38
                  don't play dumb just because you managed to edit your ridiculous comment in time to alter my post in progress
                  dave of mutilation

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by little dave hedgehog View Post
                    don't play dumb just because you managed to edit your ridiculous comment in time to alter my post in progress
                    We always have to read Neil's posts twice.
                    Are we winning?

                    Comment


                      #40
                      i don't. speak for yourself, you smug *******
                      dave of mutilation

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by little dave hedgehog View Post
                        i don't. speak for yourself, you smug *******


                        Smug me? no way!
                        Are we winning?

                        Comment


                          #42
                          How's your avant garde desk

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by CJ View Post
                            How's your avant garde desk


                            It's still here but not used anymore.
                            Are we winning?

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Nigey, you're a fool.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                a smug one
                                dave of mutilation

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X